tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post472755878772334127..comments2024-01-01T17:21:52.555+00:00Comments on Is the BBC biased?: Backlash bewareCraighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08741318067991857821noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-42612598642426686282019-11-08T14:08:47.586+00:002019-11-08T14:08:47.586+00:00Yes, I noticed how Kay Burley was unusually quiet ...Yes, I noticed how Kay Burley was unusually quiet - and how much better the "interview" was for it!! <br /><br />Some points:<br /><br />1. Confusion arises through the use of "anti-semitism"...there is anti-semitism in the Labour Party (part of the long socialist tradition of associating Jewish people with capitalism) but there is also a lot of radical anti-Judaism (RAJ). This is of course associated with Islam. It is an ideological objection, not one based on conventional racial classifications, since of course the founder of Islam was himself a Semite (although sometimes it seems to shade into racism of a kind). RAJ is based on the Koran, the Hadith and the Life of Mo. For followers of Islam, followers of Judaism are guilty of a kind of original sin: rejecting Mo's message at a very crucial and difficult stage for him, and this offence has to be revenged on later generations. This is why Jews, and no one else, are - under Islam - prohibited from living in Arabia, even to this day (a fact hardly ever aired on the BBC for some reason...). It's a long complicated story but in essence most followers of Islam are familiar with the stories from the Hadiths including the one that speaks plainly about the eradication of the last Jew. This is why I call it radical anti-Judaismm - it's a radical in the sense that what happened in Germany in the 30s and 40s was in accord with radical anti-semitism. <br /><br />The point I'm getting to is that Labour not only "will not" but, more importantly, cannot confront this evil because it would strike at the very heart of their mutlicultural PC one-world project. <br /><br />2. Glad you put "moderate" in inverted commas. I don't know about Austin and Woodcock, but people like Jess Phillips, Stella Creasy, Keith Starmer, Harriet Harman, Baroness Chakrabati, Hillary Benn and Yvette Cooper are far from being truly moderate - which I would take to mean reflecting the general "middle ground" of opinion in the country. They all agree with continued mass immigration running at something like 6 million a decade. Creasy and most of them want a no borders policy - letting in anyone, even those currently resident in France who claim to be asylum seekers. Phillips wants vetting of all parliamentary candidates to see if they meet her idea of acceptability (ie being political correct). None of them support free speech and in fact want to extend legal penalties for free speech. None of them have condemned incidents like leftist mobs turning up at politicians' home, howling hate. None of them condemn law breaking by Trade Unions. None of them oppose left wing identity politics - in fact they encourage it. Monkey Brainsnoreply@blogger.com