tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post6259197567257570906..comments2024-01-01T17:21:52.555+00:00Comments on Is the BBC biased?: Further ReadingCraighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08741318067991857821noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-53805289880533772802018-10-07T13:25:14.717+01:002018-10-07T13:25:14.717+01:00Yes I heard that too: the extent and direction of ...Yes I heard that too: the extent and direction of his intervention, with prepared material and commentary, was startling. My goodness, what an eager beaver to get stuck in! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-12245732771230333102018-10-07T12:29:33.527+01:002018-10-07T12:29:33.527+01:00For some reason I've got a picture in my mind ...For some reason I've got a picture in my mind of Simpson with his snout firmly in the trough and his little tail wagging behind. <br /><br />The Mike Dowd article was very good. I don't listen to the programme but I would certainly expect Chiles to be turning up the bias knob to 11 whereas as Dimbleby has to keep it to a respectable 7...<br /><br />Talking of Dimblebys, I heard the younger one on AQ...it seemed like he had taken over the programme with his direct questioning of the Tory, judicious use of texts to pose further damaging questions, and his own commentary on what the Tory (smarmy Alan Duncan I think it was) said in reply. <br /><br /><br />Monkey Brainsnoreply@blogger.com