tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post8810691723250341182..comments2024-01-01T17:21:52.555+00:00Comments on Is the BBC biased?: Richard Dawkins heckles Radio 4Craighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08741318067991857821noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-44041890369863346792018-12-05T10:03:40.516+00:002018-12-05T10:03:40.516+00:00Smear and Dismiss
Putting a smear-label on someone...Smear and Dismiss<br />Putting a smear-label on someone nd then dismissing them is a poor argument techniques usually used by lefty/liberals these days.Stew Greennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-75303838037551682942018-11-20T11:51:45.022+00:002018-11-20T11:51:45.022+00:00What a sad age to live in when someone like Dawkin...What a sad age to live in when someone like Dawkins is described as a fanatic. Terrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-56633189711298358152018-11-19T23:34:38.265+00:002018-11-19T23:34:38.265+00:00He may be a fanatic but - unlike a lot of fanatics...He may be a fanatic but - unlike a lot of fanatics - he is consistent in his fanaticism. I quite like his Anglican Atheism, as I do Atheistic Anglicanism. <br /><br />Monkey Brainsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-92222254681937711212018-11-19T21:57:12.440+00:002018-11-19T21:57:12.440+00:00I heard that programme and it was quite enlighteni...I heard that programme and it was quite enlightening about a range of religions and traditions and the symbolic meaning of blood. Nothing wrong with explaining why the Jehovah's Witnesses take that view and how medics deal with it. Dawkins is a fanatic and thus a dope himself.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com