tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post2408351129838004167..comments2024-01-01T17:21:52.555+00:00Comments on Is the BBC biased?: Hugh Sykes in harmonious RoubaixCraighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08741318067991857821noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-78744552372076929782015-01-20T14:01:09.415+00:002015-01-20T14:01:09.415+00:00psychopaths posing as Muslims loyal to Mohammed
R...<i>psychopaths posing as Muslims loyal to Mohammed</i><br /><br />Really? Really? This is a parody, right? Because that's exactly what we accuse the Beeboids of thinking and saying. I stopped reading right there, and may or may not come back to it with a more open mind.<br /><br />Until the BBC has Nicky Campbell or another of the worst offenders do a full show telling the likes of Mo Ansar and Anjem Choudary that they're not Muslims, there is no hope of the BBC even beginning to get it about right.David Preisernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-91723355057976435802015-01-19T23:43:54.392+00:002015-01-19T23:43:54.392+00:00Many thanks for the speedy response.Many thanks for the speedy response.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-89784603321632167532015-01-19T23:34:06.487+00:002015-01-19T23:34:06.487+00:00Is Hugh Sykes an Imam? Has he memorised the whole...Is Hugh Sykes an Imam? Has he memorised the whole of Koran? Is he experienced in Sharia Law judgements? One suspects the answers to those three questions are a resounding NO. <br /><br />There was a pathetic "thought piece" by him just after the Hebdo murders making clear he is a child of the sixties - a rather nice time to be young - and would like everything to be as hippies dreamed they would be, but are not. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-58627065138954812672015-01-19T23:13:09.580+00:002015-01-19T23:13:09.580+00:00...and there's precious little information abo......and there's precious little information about it on. <br /><br />Wikipedia (France) says:<br /><br />La présence d'une pratique cultuelle juive à Roubaix remonte à la fin du xix e siècle. Durant cette période la ville voit la création d'un temple voué au culte israélite, au numéro de la rue des Champs. Depuis sa destruction dans les années 2000, la ville n'abrite plus aucun lieu de culte israélite.<br /><br />[The presence of a Jewish liturgical practice in Roubaix back to the late nineteenth century. During this period the city saw the creation of a temple dedicated to Jewish worship at number 51 in the Rue des Champs. Since its destruction in the 2000s , the city no longer harbor any place of Jewish worship.]Craighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08741318067991857821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-48834977604030811782015-01-19T23:08:35.770+00:002015-01-19T23:08:35.770+00:00I'm guessing though it's more likely to be...I'm guessing though it's more likely to be redundancy. If so, "demolished" would probably have been a better word.Craighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08741318067991857821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-91202400571028364872015-01-19T23:04:26.289+00:002015-01-19T23:04:26.289+00:00Not sure myself.
I've refashioned that parag...Not sure myself. <br /><br />I've refashioned that paragraph to make it clear that that's how Marc Weitzmann put in.Craighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08741318067991857821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-53676880546975080482015-01-19T22:58:59.914+00:002015-01-19T22:58:59.914+00:00A disturbing piece, but I'm not sure what you ...A disturbing piece, but I'm not sure what you mean by "The last synagogue in Roubaix was destroyed in 2000".<br /><br />Destroyed by Islamists outraged at a Jewish presence? Redeveloped as being redundant? Fallen prey to the death watch beetle?<br /><br />Please clarify!<br /><br />Thanks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com