tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post5515980518374328070..comments2024-01-01T17:21:52.555+00:00Comments on Is the BBC biased?: A case in pointCraighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08741318067991857821noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-33111580749262727712014-11-23T17:28:33.682+00:002014-11-23T17:28:33.682+00:00Yes, they are always changing headlines. You somet...Yes, they are always changing headlines. You sometimes see a headline on, say, the BBC Home page and a different headline once you click into the article. That's not something even Newssniffer seems able to pick up.Craighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08741318067991857821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-64500720838578164242014-11-23T01:42:11.489+00:002014-11-23T01:42:11.489+00:00Yes. As Hugh Sykes would tell you, if the BBC put ...Yes. As Hugh Sykes would tell you, if the BBC put the Muslim bit at the top, it would give permission for prejudice. Can't have that. What's really sad is that thousands of Beeboids seethed with anger at management's refusal to broadcast that Hamas appeal a couple years ago, and at management's decision to report honestly about what went down on the Marvi Marmara. Yet there are no complaints or angry Beeboid tweets about this sort of thing.David Preisernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-89253452283016563632014-11-22T17:24:12.311+00:002014-11-22T17:24:12.311+00:00It may be worth noting that the link to that caref...It may be worth noting that the link to that carefully vague headline you quote leads to a story with a different headline.<br /><br />Possibly it was quietly changed by the BBC with the original not really impressing on any basis, professional to ethical.<br /><br />As the BBC is prone to do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com