tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post6745274075924050107..comments2024-01-01T17:21:52.555+00:00Comments on Is the BBC biased?: Consider the aftermathCraighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08741318067991857821noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-76237699882551590452018-05-02T11:30:10.434+01:002018-05-02T11:30:10.434+01:00Haven't read the Daisley Spectator article yet...Haven't read the Daisley Spectator article yet but from the para you quote, Sue, he has obviously forgotten that the Home Office is not as large as it used to be and it has more Ministers than ever.<br /><br />Responsibilities for Passports and broadcasting, for example, have been hived off.<br /><br />The taxpayer should - rightly - be very upset with Whitehall. Increasingly responsible for less, resourced with more and doing everything worse than before. For example, £50 million wasted on the botched supervision of the West Coast Main Line renewal bid at Transport.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-67566009305095166682018-05-02T11:19:50.855+01:002018-05-02T11:19:50.855+01:00Typical swamp dwellers, the whole thing needs brin...Typical swamp dwellers, the whole thing needs bringing down.The elite think they are untouchable, so continue to play their political games ie derailing leaving Brusseles, unfettered and unhindered cheap labour, islamification ,and on and on.These people are traitorious Bastards and need culling and soon.The sooner people take to the streets the quicker these cnuts can be gotten rid of. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-76052233431264664012018-05-01T19:34:30.719+01:002018-05-01T19:34:30.719+01:00Laura Kuennesberg has an article up on the BBC web...Laura Kuennesberg has an article up on the BBC website headed:<br /><br />'Sajid will do what's in Sajid's interests'<br /><br />http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43957020<br /><br />That's pretty much my assessment of him as well. But one does have to wonder whether LK has ever had an article with a similar theme about, say, a Lib Dem minister or a Labour Minister/Shadow Minister. <br /><br />Not really sure this is quite the "impartiality" one is supposed to expect from the BBC. Monkey Brainsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-3270743328622497142018-05-01T09:34:15.774+01:002018-05-01T09:34:15.774+01:00Constituency MPs must be held responsible for thei...Constituency MPs must be held responsible for their lack of determination called to account by their electorate. At present, they are voted in on a set of aspirations and values, they win their seat, but then, largely, they abandon the concerns of their constituents in favour of a Westminster groupthink that reflects very closely the London-left BBC message especially in the matter of immigration.<br /><br />It is literally as if the MPs cross borders into another country when they enter Westminster, where traditional values have no place. They should remember who it was that elected them - and why.Loondon Callinghttp://otboae.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-77013961112853751852018-05-01T08:53:42.194+01:002018-05-01T08:53:42.194+01:00Stephen Daisley is wrong about Blair, the splittin...Stephen Daisley is wrong about Blair, the splitting up of the Home Office was forced on him by the EU, to align us with EuroLaw.<br />Rudd said it was her job to keep people safe then goes on to list terrorism (immigrants), knife crime and acid attacks (immigrants), domestic violence (honour killings, immigrants), waring factions (Syrian immigrants)and economic crime (Nigerian and East European immigrants).<br />We used to talk about politicians 'closing the stable door after the horse has bolted', now they open the stable door, let in the wolves and then wonder why the horses are dead.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-8759753479915694582018-04-30T23:44:01.133+01:002018-04-30T23:44:01.133+01:00I think we have now reached a very dangerous point...I think we have now reached a very dangerous point in our politics. People with deep roots in the UK (families and culture) are being told in essence that they don't count and if they express concern they are deluded, uneducated or plain r**ist. <br /><br />There are tens of millions of migration sceptics in the country but there isn't a single migration sceptic MP in the whole of the House of Commons, or at least not one prepared to argue in public that there have been many negative effects of mass immigration in terms of our national security, the environment, our social harmony, the lives of young women, crime, housing, productivity and health. <br /><br />This is not going to end well. You can't have a whole political class ignore reality completely and expect things to work out well...the denial of reality has already had some tragic consequences but these are going to become ever more evident if MPs refuse to address the reality. <br /><br />UKIP's Gerard Batten spoke some sense on the Peston show, suggesting that a new migration system needs to distinguish clearly between time limited work permits and permanent migration, with the aim being to get the latter down to levels more like the 30k seen in the early 80s. A lone voice it would seem in terms of those allowed on TV. Monkey Brainsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-33085841925177153972018-04-30T17:30:57.917+01:002018-04-30T17:30:57.917+01:00I share your concerns MB. Immigration is the eleph...I share your concerns MB. Immigration is the elephant in the room. The Brexit vote was in a good part about making a credible effort to restrict the numbers. Dianne Abbott refuses to say that a future Labour Government would tackle the problem of illegal immigration. She says that the Windrush Generation 'built Britain'. It looks as if the Conservatives are running scared of the issue. The calling of another General Election would play straight into the hands of the London Left elite with the Brexit decision reversed.Loondon Callinghttp://otboae.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-22919494937805954322018-04-30T16:05:04.973+01:002018-04-30T16:05:04.973+01:00A pro-migration anti-Brexit ex-banker globalist (l...A pro-migration anti-Brexit ex-banker globalist (like Amber herself) would appear to be the perfect pick for the role of Homes Secretary. <br /><br />I noticed on the news this morning at about 8.30 I think, on Radio 4, that Amber Rudd was described as having "accepted" that she had inadvertently misled the committee, as though that were the charge levelled against her. That implies that it is reasonable to think she inadvertently misled the committee, when the truth is she was either lying or grossly (and I mean grossly) incompetent. In a later bulletin it was changed to it being what she "said" - which is fair enough. <br /><br />I had the feeling the BBC were bending over backwards to help Rudd. They need now to boost her credibility so she can lead the fight against Brexit. So they don't want her too damaged. In fact the theme emerging on Today was that it was really May who should be in the dock as she had initiated the supposed "hostile environment" policy. <br /><br />Today had a quick overview of the story with Ms Gentle I think it was of the Guardian and Matthew Parris (so the usual, well balanced panel). Parris sounded a bit anxious about what might now occur...which as a pro-Brexiter I found encouraging. <br /><br />It is a bit of a knifepoint moment. It could go either way. <br /><br />Javid is completely over-promoted. He has never done or said anything impressive or come up with a novel political idea...and yet here he is, being shoehorned into one of the great offices of state. Yet another example of the weird ways of PC politics that now dominate our national life. How far we have fallen. Monkey Brainsnoreply@blogger.com