tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post7215321273287360043..comments2024-01-01T17:21:52.555+00:00Comments on Is the BBC biased?: How far is far-right?Craighttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08741318067991857821noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-23477758582164235702018-07-15T12:25:30.174+01:002018-07-15T12:25:30.174+01:00A very , very dangerous man. Perfect for a May adm...A very , very dangerous man. Perfect for a May administration. Monkey Brainsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-3257851796315894572018-07-14T23:43:09.249+01:002018-07-14T23:43:09.249+01:00Our probable future director of public prosecution...Our probable future director of public prosecutions believes media shouldn't report on Islamic terrorism <br /><a href="https://twitter.com/MichaelLCrick/status/881774331273072642/photo/1" rel="nofollow">2014 article</a><br /><br />Terror watchdog Max Hill QC who once called for laws not to target Muslims shortlisted TOP to take over £204,000-a-year director of prosecutions job<br /><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5953341/Britains-terror-watchdog-met-group-praised-Jihadi-John-tipped-DPP.html" rel="nofollow">Mail</a>stewgreenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10223073927227101097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-65526618212564873842018-07-14T23:39:25.502+01:002018-07-14T23:39:25.502+01:00This comment has been removed by the author.stewgreenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10223073927227101097noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-30341696204392226742018-07-13T12:56:52.192+01:002018-07-13T12:56:52.192+01:00Usual truths Sue!
When they can`t blame the Jews, ...Usual truths Sue!<br />When they can`t blame the Jews, they can only blame themselves.<br />We`ve left public debate and discourse, most of us will make aliyah and lets see Islam geld, bridle, saddle and ride to hell that weak white horse that Osama Bin Laded said we were in the west.<br />The left in Iran also though there`s be some kind of limited rainbow alliance(Islamic green and Soviet red-rather limited but hey?)in 1979...oh dear.<br />Great site this, why you bother with the BBC though is a mystery,the coming civil war will neither be televised, not used as clickbait for Mishal and her munchkins on the radio.Miranda Bellaconihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00784319380509264350noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-70902560401824616072018-07-12T16:30:18.361+01:002018-07-12T16:30:18.361+01:00"Did you not know that there is enmity and na... "Did you not know that there is enmity and natural antipathy between your kind and mine? Did you not know that a serpent in the bosom, a mouse in a bag and fire in a barn give their hosts an ill reward?"<br /><br />Apparently not and in any case it is forbidden knowledge now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-81393001907722376512018-07-12T13:20:26.755+01:002018-07-12T13:20:26.755+01:00Interesting piece on a related theme - employment ...Interesting piece on a related theme - employment (or otherwise) of people with awkward views.<br /><br />http://hurryupharry.org/2018/07/10/imran-waheed-from-hizb-ut-tahrir/<br /><br />Here we have NHS psychiatrist Imran Waheed, a member of Hizb ut Tahrir. He’s in a position of power and influence which even Khalid Mahmood MP finds problematic.<br /><br />Contrast this with the unfortunate primary school dinner lady who lost her job because she went to a rally.<br />https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-40531321<br /><br />Incidentally, the BBC appears distinctly sympathetic to the lady in question, Rachel Booth. They give her account of the story a pretty good airing. it looks as if ‘getting the sack’ trumps some of the others in the BBC’s league of pet causes.suehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02693686958796849316noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-25422222169387325612018-07-12T11:41:13.268+01:002018-07-12T11:41:13.268+01:00Well there's a question it's difficult to ...Well there's a question it's difficult to answer! A lot things came together I think. I'd say it was a combination of things - colonial guilt, slave ownership guilt, the example of the horrors of fascism in WW2 (every action has an equal and opposite action sort of thing), short term commercial interest (non-unionised cheap labour), and political interest (mass migration has kept Labour afloat and may yet see it in power). <br /><br />Once it had become an established pattern, mass immigration to the UK developed its own momentum. A range of lobby groups support removal of virtually all border controls, facilitated chain migration and engaged aggressively on the political scene throwing the R Charge against anyone who expresses scepticism about the alleged benefits of mass immigration or who wishes to preserve mainstream British culture. <br /><br />Regarding Australia, I think even they - for all their wealth of natural resources had problems at times dealing with the inflow and many British migrants spent years in communcal tin shacks awaiting proper housing. <br /><br />As you suggest, you'd think that our well educated politicians would have seen the dangers of Islam in partcular. <br /><br />I'd say a population of 35 million would have been a good goal. London lost several million of its population between 1950 and 1970 - the same period that Londoners saw a huge rise in their prosperity and standard of living. The idea that you need to constantly up your population to stimulate the economy is of course absurd. Monkey Brainsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-35943432814541969752018-07-12T09:41:54.585+01:002018-07-12T09:41:54.585+01:00It saddens me that most of today's problems ha...It saddens me that most of today's problems have been created by post-war politicians of all parties.<br />One would have thought that it would be obvious that mass-immigration of the 'same sort' of people in a short time period into a country would cause problems unless well planned for. In the days of the '£10 Poms' one could conceive that Australia could plan to fill its largely empty country by building new towns etc. taking in batches as places became available. The newcomers could be expected to either integrate quickly or decide it wasn't for them and return home.<br />Post-war there were some that made a good case for the UK settling for a population of 35 million but that was ignored (why?) and the doors were opened to just about anyone, including many whose culture and beliefs opposed those of the UK. So unlike Australia the 'sort' were different and the planning non-existent.<br />One would have thought that it would be obvious that Islam in particular is a belief that allows for no opposition and will never sit well with those of any other faith or none. I liken it to Communism. The democrat says "Let the communists take part in the elections!" Then when the communists win the election they say, "There will be no more elections". You and I might debate what colour the council should paint the lamp posts, we can each live with whatever colour is chosen. But what happens when a new 'neighbour' declares street lighting to be contrary to his firmly held irrational religious beliefs? Surely it would be better for all if those beliefs were freely expressed 'back home', not 'accomodated' by politicians here?<br />Are these politicians stupid or is it a deliberate plan to destroy the best societies that have ever existed?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3272054900018746845.post-29835789748250169182018-07-11T23:27:28.501+01:002018-07-11T23:27:28.501+01:00Let's be honest. You can't offer any ratio...Let's be honest. You can't offer any rational critique of this sort of discourse. It is simply part of an extensive ecosystem where we have to pretend there are no nasty passages in the Koran or Hadith, where every culture is of equal merit and every migrant is a wonderful contributor to our society. To be part of the ecosystem, to prosper in it (get a salary, win plaudits, be rewarded with honours) we have to believe in Alice's Wonderland, Pie in the Sky and England Winning the World Cup Again all rolled into one. The non-believers are cast into the outer darkness and given harsh anathemas like "divisive", "fascist" and "racist" - and then deprived of their livelihoods. When I say "deprived of their livelihoods" I mean that for real. No actor who decided to come out firmly in favour of Trump, Brexit and nationalism would ever work again in the UK or Hollywood. That's the end of your career. But that would also apply to lots of other fields of employment. Would someone who favoured Trump, Brexit and nationalism ever get to be a Supreme Court judge in the UK? No way!!! But even at much lower levels it will retard your career. <br /><br />We need to be clear that there is a war on. Thankfully not too many lives being lost but a lot of people's lives being destroyed. <br /><br />Monkey Brainsnoreply@blogger.com