In the UK and the USA (and Russia and most of the world), army veterans are overwhelmingly regarded with huge warmth by the public.
This BBC Twitter headline today, therefore, raised a lot of few hackles for using 'veteran' as a noun and tying it to an IRA terrorist:
"Murderer, terrorist, criminal. Not veteran" sums up the general reaction.
The opening paragraph of the BBC News website's report does the same:
*******
Here's a further flavour of the reaction:
- Veteran, BBC? Sealing your fate methinks.
- "IRA Veteran". A headline to make you sick from our supposedly national broadcaster. A broadcaster that Irish people can watch for free, but which takes poor Britons to court to force them to pay for itself.
- IRA murderer is now classed as a ‘veteran’ by the BBC!
- ‘IRA veteran’ should reading ‘IRA terrorist’.
- He wasn’t a “veteran” he was an IRA murderer.
- "IRA veteran". I think they mean terrorist. Keep paying the licence fee or you could go to prison.
- Veteran, eh? Well done to the BBC. Never fail to show their colours...
- "Veteran". Do you think this is appropriate language to describe a member of a terrorist organisation?
Though someone quipped:
- IRA veteran and Londonderry in the same headline just to make sure they’ve pissed off everybody. #impartial
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.