Brits for blasphemy (II)

Following on from Sue's post (and from two previous posts about the BBC's Innes Bowen)...

This morning's Sunday led with the news about Mumtaz Qadri's funeral, with Edward Stourton expressing his (understandable) astonishment that tens of thousands of people had come out to demonstrate in favour of an assassin and BBC correspondent Shaimaa Khalil echoing that, saying that if you'd have landed in Pakistan and seen the crowds you might have assumed Qadri was a national hero rather than a killer.

Ed then talked to Innes Bowen, BBC editor and author of Medina in Birmingham, Najaf in Brent:

Ed Stourton: Innes, what have you picked up on social media here, by way of indications of the sort of impact it's having in Britain? 

Innes Bowen: Very, very surprising actually to me. Shaimaa called the people who are regarding this guy as a martyr as 'hardliners' but in the UK the people who've come out in his support are people who were previously regarded as the most moderate of religious groups, and that's a group called the Barelvis - a Sufi group that controls about just under 40% of mosques in the UK. And these are people who have no connection with jihadist groups, who are really regarded as the love-and-peace wing of Sunni Islam in Britain. Yet some of their most prominent clerics have this week come out, calling this guy a 'martyr'. And this has caused quite a stir on social media. You know, it's brought other people out to say, 'No, this is completely wrong' - for example, the Association of British Muslims. One of their co-directors, Paul Salahuddin-Armstrong wrote, "Under no circumstances should anyone be celebrating the death of a convicted murderer as a saint". But in saying that he's actually coming out against his own Sufi order. A prominent mosque of that order in Birmingham - the Ghamkol Sharif mosque - on the front page of their website has something calling this chap 'a martyr'. 

Ed Stourton: What's going on? I mean, why from a moderate group (as you say) those sort of opinions? 

Innes Bowen: Well, the Barelvis have a very, very intense love of the Prophet Muhammad...Of course, all Muslims revere the Prophet Muhammad but with the Barelvis it's kind of done with a great intensity. And that does mean when there are things like any insults to the Prophet Muhammad or anything regarded as blasphemy that is when they are really roused. So over The Satanic Verses, the cartoons...the Danish cartoon dispute, that kind of thing, they will come out quite militantly. But this I think is really a quite dramatic development. 

Shaimaa Khalil then described how the Barelvis have also been involved in the Pakistani demonstrations, despite their having been the target of violence themselves from hardline Wahhabis mainly from Saudi-funded madrassas. These institutions have been vigorously trying to convert the Barelvis - at the insistence of the Saudis.

Then Ed Stourton continued his discussion with Innes Bowen:

Ed Stourton: Innes. You're sitting in Whitehall worrying about extremism and you pick up the kind of social media traffic that you've seen you're going to be...well...discouraged. 

Innes Bowen:  I think so. I mean, this was the largest Muslim...you know...Islamic network in the UK that was considered 'moderate' and now some of its most senior people and most important institutions are effectively supporting violent extremism. 

Well, quite.

That was good reporting from the BBC, wasn't it? As per Sue, they were not letting support for Mumtaz Qadri by British Muslims slip by under their noses, unchallenged and uncontested. And that's as it should be.

Let's hope their outrage here finally marks the start of the BBC investigating this properly - and prominently.

Myths of Muslim Britain

The other day, Craig examined a book written by a radio producer called Innes Bowen who turned up on  radio 4's “Sunday”. Medina in Birmingham, Najaf in Brent. Here’s what she said re the Cardiff-born jihadi.

The thing that the people who go have in common really, it's a shared set of ideals. They're young. They're idealistic. And if you look at that video yesterday you can see in this case certainly not stupid, very intelligent young man, and on that video he's appealing to other Muslims to a sense of duty. He's making them try to feel that they have a sense of duty to go to Iraq and Syria, and that is the ideology which is inspiring some people to go.

  

As Craig says, that does sound a bit too ‘BBC’ for the likes of we cranky old Islamophobic bigots, and the fact that Peter Oborne gave it an admiring review in the Telegraph all but confirmed the understandable assumption that it was only to do with “dispelling myths” about British Muslims, as the BBC is wont to do, more fool it. 

Only, here’s a review in the Times by Dominic Kennedy (£) which gives a different impression:

A compelling study reveals that so-called leaders of the Islamic community are not only self-appointed but tend to come from marginal sects

There has always been a riddle about Salma Yaqoob, the eloquent former leader of Respect and Question Time panellist. Where did this fearsome political operator come from? The answer to that and other puzzles about British Muslims is in this gripping study by Innes Bowen about the rival sects in Islam.

Here the text fades away and asks you to dish out your dosh, which many of you won’t do, so here’s more.

“Ms Yaqoob, it emerges, was a member of Young Muslims UK, an Islamist group that spawned Liberal democrat and SNP parliamentary candidates. The group’s roots are in Jamaat-e-Islami, a political party that imposed Sharia on secular Pakistan.
Bowen is struck by the grip that sectarian groups with overseas origins still have on a British-born Muslim population that is growing in size and religiosity. So-called Muslim community leaders are not only self-appointed,but, as Bowen shows, tend to come from these marginal sects."

So if this review is anything to go by, and the strap line by the way is:

 "A compelling study by a BBC Radio 4 producer reveals that so-called leaders of the Islamic community are not only self-appointed but also tend to come from marginal sects with origins overseas."

Whaddya make of that? Did Peter Oborne cherry pick the only “optimistic” passages to suit his pro-Islam agenda

 “ ...there is no contradiction between Muslim identity and loyalty to the British state. 

...over time there is no fundamental contradiction between Islam and the modern Western state.” 

Or is this simply an example of people projecting their own wishful thinking onto whatever comes their way?