Director-general Tim Davie should be challenging the charge that the corporation has moved away from impartial reporting, not accepting it, writes Philip J Collins.
Friday, 5 November 2021
Well, He Would, Wouldn’t He?
Saturday, 6 February 2021
For many
I'm Geeta Guru-Murthy.
[Cheerful tone.] This week, we heard President Biden's new take on US foreign policy - ending support for the Saudi offensive in Yemen, a tougher line on Russia and a still strong stance against China.
[More serious tone, knitted brow.] The challenges ahead are many. In the last few days alone, we have seen protests crushed and heard deeply unsettling evidence of the human capacity for evil.
[Even more serious tone, even more knitted brow.] In China, horrifying news emerged of atrocities against the Muslim Uighurs. In Russia, thousands were arrested for protesting in support of Alexei Navalny. And in Myanmar, Aung San Suu Kyi and civilian leaders were put in detention in a military coup.
[Brighter tone, shoulders rising, eyebrows shooting up.] But - there is a new leader in the White House, which, for many, is grounds for hope, and across the world we see almost unbelievable acts of individual bravery from those who will not be cowed.
Saturday, 7 November 2020
The end of populism?
*
From John Simpson's interview with Geeta Guru-Murthy this lunchtime, it looks as if the BBC believes that the 'populist balloon' (as John Simpson put it) has burst:
Geeta Guru-Murthy: With me is our world affairs editor, John Simpson. Obviously, nothing is confirmed yet, but if this is the end of the Trump era, how would you reflect on this? Has this been an aberration in a sense within the US democracy or a sign of very changing politics?
John Simpson: There has been a change in politics, otherwise Trump could not have been elected in the first place and wouldn't have stayed there. I think this looks as though this is the end of a very, very turbulent and difficult period, not just in America but around the world. NATO has suffered terribly over the last four years. America's relationship with other countries has suffered very, very badly. I think the first thing Joe Biden will do, assuming he does become President, is to get on the phone to all the NATO leaders and try to kind of win them back into the fold. Of course, he will be talking to Britain about Brexit too.
Geeta Guru-Murthy: You have met Biden, what kind of man is he?
John Simpson: He is very much an American politician. I mean, he looks good and looks are kind of the most important thing, in some ways, at that kind of level. I would say, he is not like Clinton, a sort of brilliant intellectual, or Obama himself whom he served under. But he is bright. He knows how to argue a case. But the key thing I think about him is that he is instinctively a kind of agreement man. He's promised already to reach across the aisle to Republicans. He did that in the past. He was actually doing that when I actually met him, in 1995 I think it was. He has got real abilities to win over people of different political persuasions.
Geeta Guru-Murthy: He does have an extraordinary personal back story. How much does that matter in US politics?
John Simpson: I think it does matter a lot. It matters mostly in the way that ordinary people relate to him, and it is possibly easier to relate to Biden, the man who grew up with a bad stutter, a working-class or lower-middle-class background who made spectacularly good. The Irishness of his background. All of these things are attractive to American voters.
Geeta Guru-Murthy: When we look at where we are now, obviously still in a very fragile state within the race position. Trump obviously does not look like he wants to concede. Lots of comparisons and fears about authoritarian instincts. You have met and covered many real authoritarian regimes, how would you put the current state of democracy? Is it fragile in the US or not?
John Simpson: I personally don't think it is fragile at all. I think a country that can absorb four years of the most disruptive and least controlled president in its history and can have an election in which he is voted out, not by a very large majority, is a country with a very strong system indeed. It looks chaotic. The Chinese and Russians both loved it, and they say is this the kind of system that you want? But in fact it will work. It will produce a new president. And I think, after a while Trumpism will start to fade.
Geeta Guru-Murthy: What does that mean for other leaders here? We mentioned Brexit, Boris Johnson, seen as allied in style and political instincts, to a degree, with Trump. Will that reflect badly on the current British government? Will it bode ill for a potential trade deal?
John Simpson: Joe Biden really doesn't like Boris Johnson, and he said some quite hostile things about him. He certainly doesn't like Brexit. At the same time, I think is actually an Anglophile. I think we will see him judging everything to do with Britain and Brexit through the prism of Ireland - how it affects Ireland, how bad it will be for Ireland if, for instance, there is a no-deal Brexit. Personally I think that now that Biden seems to be coming in, I think we will hear a lot less about a no-deal Brexit because I think America would really set its face against that. Presumably, there will be a trade agreement between Britain and America, because there has been probably on very much the lines already negotiated.
Geeta Guru-Murthy: In a broader way, if Trump goes, we still haven't had it confirmed of course, does it change the way, the style of leadership, not only for Boris Johnson but for Bolsonaro or for Modi, or for others who have developed a certain brand of politics?
John Simpson: I think the key to that kind of populist government will have vanished. I think if Trump...Everybody, every populist - I'm not really including Boris Johnson in this because I don't think he is entirely a populist - but people like Bolsonaro, for instance, they are only there because Trump was there. With Trump gone, I think the gas goes out of the balloon as far as they are concerned. Britain I think is entirely in a different position, but the Johnson government is going to have to find a way of coming to terms with the Biden government, a very different government from the one it has been used to.
Geeta Guru-Murthy: China, of course, a lot of questions whether Biden will take a gentler stance towards China, but the Democrats also have got major concerns. haven't they, on that front?
John Simpson: Biden has said he won't be softer on China and I don't see how he could be. I think in that respect, Donald Trump has kind of establish new sets of goalposts, and I think it would be impossible for Joe Biden to go back to a gentler, easier, more friendly relationship with China. I think he's got to be as firm as Donald Trump, otherwise he will look weak. And the same will have to be true of Russia too.
Geeta Guru-Murthy: Finally, what have you made of the last roller-coaster few days? It's been nail-biting to watch, hasn't it? How big a shift is it?
John Simpson: I saw the 2000 election, I was there in Florida. That was nail-biting. But I haven't got an awful lot of nails left, really.
Geeta Guru-Murthy: John Simpson, the BBC's world affairs editor, many thanks indeed.
If they think that Donald Trump losing by a small margin but also picking up 7-8 million more votes than he picked up in 2016 means the beginning of the end for Trumpism then it sounds as if they're closing their ears.
And if they think it means the end of populism, with the aforementioned Mr Bolsonaro still remaining quite popular and Mr Modi remaining exceptionally popular, then they are surely engaging in wishful thinking.
Saturday, 13 June 2020
The controversial Geeta Guru-Murthy
Unusually for me, I've suddenly started intervening on Twitter. I thought I'd share this conversation with you as I think it's very telling. I found the 'offending words' via TV Eyes.
Alastair Stewart OBE: "The controversial statue of Winston Churchill". As described in a BBC headline...
Adrian Hilton: I'm not disbelieving of Alastair Stewart, but does anyone have a screengrab of this?
Alastair Stewart OBE: It was BBC Breaking so I am not sure you can get that on 'catch-up'. It would take an odd soul to sit there with an iPhone...you'll just have to take my word for it, I guess.
Adrian Hilton: As I said, I'm happy to take your word for it, because I know you to be an honourable man. My appeal was simply for visual evidence, so I may illustrate.
Craig Byers: If anyone can find video footage, it was on the BBC News Channel at 3pm: "This is BBC News with the latest headlines for viewers in the UK and around the world. I'm Geeta Guru-Murthy. Groups including right-wing activists have clashed with police in central London as they gather near Parliament Square and the controversial statue of Sir Winston Churchill".
Adrian Hilton: I'm slightly irritated by this (h/t Alastair Stewart OBE). If a tiny group of protesters object to something, and the BBC magnifies or affirms their grievance by rendering it 'controversial', then BBC News must call itself 'controversial'. There is no controversy for the vast majority.
Saturday, 1 February 2020
"It is a very white crowd"
This is quite something:
BOOM #BrexitDay BBC reporter "it's a very white crowd"— BanTheBBC (@BanTheBBC) February 1, 2020
Goes on to rant at the interviewee suggesting that flying the British flag wasn't 'welcoming'...
How about all these unwelcoming, British flag-flying white 'bigots' stopped paying the TV Licence??
pic.twitter.com/brXqRSQIQX
The BBC reporter in question is Geeta Guru-Murthy. Was she trying to elicit a racist answer?
BBC reporter to Brexiteers celebrating in Parliament Square: “It’s a very white crowd”. When she reports at the Notting Hill Carnival, does she point out the “very black crowd” to the people she interviews too?
And does the reporter also not understand that Brexit will limit immigration from largely *white* EU countries do has bugger all to do with skin colour anyway?
Oh, and this is the only country in the world where the national flag is seen as a symbol of division not unity.
Thursday, 20 November 2014
The BBC and Har Nof
Jeremy Bowen himself wrote a BBC News website article 'explaining' the background to the attack which seems to me to typify his reporting. His focus isn't on the victims of the attack but on the grievances of the Palestinians, beginning with the failure of peace talks.
“@levy_haaretz: In Israel, only Jewish blood shocks anyone. My latest on @haaretzcom http://t.co/wFdVbrS0lA pic.twitter.com/P0ApAmiVJB”
— Jon Donnison (@JonDonnison) November 20, 2014
Haaretz editorial: Netanyahu and his ministers are endangering the public. http://t.co/HfBZbVGJW7 #israel #palestine
— Jon Donnison (@JonDonnison) November 19, 2014
Plus a couple of retweets:
In direct contradiction to Netanyahu & ministers, Shin Bet Chief says to MKs that Abbas is not encouraging the recent wave of terror attacks
— Anshel Pfeffer (@AnshelPfeffer) November 18, 2014
What the Israeli & Palestinian people need now to break this cycle of violence are strong principled, visionary leaders. Neither have them.
— Paul Danahar (@pdanahar) November 18, 2014
