Showing posts with label James Longman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Longman. Show all posts

Sunday, 19 February 2017

More on James Longman



James Longman is presently reporting for the BBC on the Paris riots. 

It was his online report that featured in the update to our post about the BBC's Paris coverage yesterday - a piece I described as being "entirely from the side of 'the aggrieved'".



Given that the BBC elsewhere have been very careful to call it an "alleged attack", that is a very bold statement. 

It's not a 'one off' either. Another tweet reads:


Even James himself in his BBC report uses the word "alleged".

A TV version of the report of his went out in the early hours of yesterday morning (before BBC Breakfast). Here's a transcript of it (minus the contributions of others):
Newsreader: The sister of the young man who was allegedly sexually assaulted by French police, has spoken to the BBC about her brother's attack and has said that there will be further violence unless justice is seen to be done. James Longman reports. 
James Longman: Youth sits idle in Paris's suburbs. This is the life they have been dealt. This is Aulnay-Sous-Bois - a district about half an hour north of Paris, and we're in the estate where 22-year-old Theo was allegedly brutalised by police. It caused massive protests, both here and across Paris, and there is real worry is that the protests will continue to intensify....Theo's Sister Eleanor shows me the graffiti's wall when he was attacked....Protests following the attack are a reminder of the chaos of 2005. France's cycle of violence. Youth versus police, black versus white, haves versus have-not's, seems to spin and spin and Theo's ordeal is part of that bigger picture...And 'shutting down' is just what President Hollande wants to do...Respect. It's earned in this place, like here at a football match in solidarity with Theo. But the opposing sides in France's struggle with race were decided long ago and it's far from over. 

Ticked off



The Mail on Sunday has a BBC story today about a BBC reporter, James Longman, "using his role at the Corporation to get a date": BBC 'Beirut Beefcake' seeks a love story by posting screengrabs on Tinder of himself reporting on Syria. The piece, in passing, includes the following information:
James was ticked off by the Beeb last month for breaking their social media policy after he shared an Instagram photo comparing Donald Trump's press conference to a speech by former Libyan dictator Colonel Gaddafi. 
So, they do still get a rap on the knuckles for displaying bias on social media platforms it seems. A previous Mail article says "James was hastily 'reminded of BBC policy'", before ending: 
His excuse? He was merely commenting on the coherence of the speech, not likening Trump to Gaddafi. Nice try James!
If James Longman got a ticking off for that then surely dozens of other, often high-profile BBC reporters should have very sore knuckles by now, given the way they've been carrying on on Twitter recently?