Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Simon reeve. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Simon reeve. Sort by date Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 October 2018

Picking Sides

I watched episode two of Simon Reeve’s journey through the Med. I don’t often watch Simon Reeve’s programmes, but I don’t particularly avoid them either. The raggedy kaffiyeh he drapes around his neck is a bit of a turn-off; but on the other hand, he does seem like a well-meaning kinda guy.

Well, like a programme that’s typical of a kaffiyeh-wearing but well-meaning guy, it brimmed with well-meaning and probably unconscious bias. The bias seemed so embedded - almost subliminal - that the thought of unpicking it all seemed wearisome and not really worth the trouble.

Then I spotted James Delingpole’s review tagged onto the end of Jodie Whittaker’s Doctor Who. (I don’t watch that either)
“Let us move swiftly on to Simon Reeve’s Mediterranean. Even though Reeve is the BBC’s go-to adventurous young travel presenter I’ve never sat through one of his documentaries before. Probably, what with his youth, stubble, cheeky-chappy grin and warmth, I just knew I was going to hate him.”

Ah, there’s a man after my own heart.

“Damn, he’s watchable though. He’s brave, curious, empathetic and tender but never sickmakingly mawkish — a complete TV natural. “

Yep. Still agree. But then I realised Dellers was actually reviewing the previous episode, some of which I saw - when a tearful farmer in Puglia was mourning the loss of his olive groves, which were being ravaged by a disease called Xylella, and Reeve put a consoling hand on his arm. It was sad.

I have no idea what James Delingpole would say about the episode I watched, the following one, and the section about Israel and Gaza in particular.

I don’t want to go into a tediously long and dull transcription of the programme However, I fear I might have to do bits of it, otherwise you won’t know what I’m talking about. And even then, possibly not. It all depends how reliant on the BBC you are for your Middle East ‘education’.

The section about Lebanon wasn’t all hang-gliding and hiking - it did include Hezbollah in the form of a disturbing visit to a weird tourist attraction - a Hezbollah museum with relics from “their victory over Israel”.

Now, Simon is in Israel with the Ashdod Naval Fleet, “patrolling your patch of the Mediterranean”. Very military. Very serious. He narrates the military patrol scenario in a matter-of-fact voice, carefully inserting the obligatory caveat “Israel says” before putting out anything that appears to justify Israel’s militarised activities. 

Simon’s voice-over:
“Israel was founded in the aftermath of the Holocaust. Its early years and often the decades since were marked by conflict and the threat of annihilation. In response, Israel invested heavily in the  military and innovation.”

The simplistic, Corbynesque implication in those few opening words “founded in the aftermath of the Holocaust” didn’t augur well for what we were about to receive, but may the Lord make us truly thankful for the fact that he threw in “the threat of annihilation” to the mix; a nod towards reality.

Suddenly we’re in Tel Aviv, beachside. Two guys on a motorbike give the peace sign.

“Here, this is party town” Simon declares, surprised. He’d been brought up to believe to expect wall-to-wall conflict within Israel.

Then, a section about Israel’s huge desalination plant. The biggest in the world. “Israel has discovered how to make drinking water out of seawater.” 
Energy efficient and almost entirely chemical free, 2 billion litres of fresh water a day. And almost entirely automated.
“Two people operate this place at night. One is drinking coffee, and one is making coffee. Then they change” jokes Dr Boris Liberman who is showing us around.

“This is an example of Israeli innovation, which is something very special about the country,” says Simon cheerfully.

“Israeli is made from the brain. It is technology. How you save money, from the brain” says Dr Liberman in heavily accented English. 

Next, we’re off to Gaza.
“ Over two million people live there. It was the most dangerous part of the journey” intones Simon ominously yet mysteriously.

And now a monologue; superficial, unsubtle, emotive, and very BBC.
“I cross one of the world’s most heavily fortified borders. This is a long walk through a cage. A caged passageway that takes us from the very modern, pretty wealthy, state of Israel to the much poorer and densely packed Gaza Strip. I’ve never been through a border crossing quite like this. It is extraordinary in every possible sense. 
My God! Look across here. Look at the barrier that encircles Gaza; a very forbidding, foreboding place to walk towards, quite frankly. There’s a dehumanisation of the people who live here. The whole process makes you feel like you’re entering the cage of the wild animals. 
Westerners are at risk of kidnap and shooting in Gaza, but also from being caught up in an Israeli military strike. Our crew vehicle had some special modifications.
Footage of a heavily armoured vehicle, in which they can be safe.

Are Westerners really in danger of being caught up in an Israeli military strike? That sounds as if the Israelis are prone to making random, unprovoked airstrikes. I suppose inserting that odd idea into it is the BBC’s idea of even-handedness. And, as for “dehumanising" -  who’s dehumanising whom? Has Simon never taken a peek at Hamas’s school curriculum? 
“Now this is Rushdi here. Rushdi’s going to be our guide in Gaza.”
We’ve met Rushdi Abualouf before. He’s one of the BBC’s reporters 'on the ground' in Gaza, and very well on it he looks too, if I may say so. 




“It’s the most bizarre thing, crossing” remarks Simon.

“Of course. I mean they keep calling Gaza the biggest open-air prison, which is true because it’s closed from (?) sight. Israel is calling this strip of land is like a hostile ….(?)” replies Rushdi, (if I caught, at least the gist of it, correctly)
“Gaza has been controlled by Hamas, a militant Islamic group considered terrorists by Israel and many Western governments. It’s not the only militant group here” 
intones Simon’s voice-over, as an accompaniment to bleak scenes shot from the moving car -  piles of rubbish and derelict-looking buildings.

In the car, he turns to Rushdi.
“That’s the black flag flying there. Is that Hamas, or…?”
“Islamic Jihad” 
murmurs Rushdi

“We’ve just gone past an Islamic Jihad checkpoint.”
“It’s not a checkpoint, it’s like military compound.”
“Bloody hell! Is this a safe..? This isn’t a safe place”


“They operate in this area because it’s not far from the border so they always try to be ready for any Israeli escalation, or..”
“Checkpoint ahead!”
“Put the cameras down.”
“They’ve taken our cameras!”
“They want to see what you’ve been filming. They are Hamas …border police”
“Hamas border force. I’m actually slightly relieved…being stopped by Hamas - phew.” 

Voice-over again:
Since 2006 Gaza has endured one Palestinian war, three wars between Hamas and Israel, ten years of strict rule by Hamas and blockade by Israel and Egypt. This has all crippled the economy”


Aaannndd…back in the room car Rushdi speaks:

“How long you can struggle? How long you have to find a way to produce power and to buy clean water? This is basic. In any part of the world, you have to worry about electricity or water for the safety of your people.” 

Then, Simon’s narrative once again; pure BBC copybook, complete with context-free factoids and statistics regurgitated, direct from Hamas headquarters.

“Israelis and Palestinians have endured endless cycles of violence. Here, militants can fire rockets into Israel. Israel can attack with overwhelming force. Weeks of conflict here in 2014 between Israel and Palestinians left 2000 civilians dead, including an estimated 500 children. 18,000 homes were destroyed. Israel restricts the supply of many building materials like cement into Gaza. Israel says to prevent Hamas building tunnels for attacks. But (a hijab-wearing female) engineering graduate Majid Maserawi (phonetic) has invented an ingenious way to help rebuild in Gaza.

“We call it green cake,” she says, and “Welcome to “our factory” where they’re making breeze-blocks out of what appears to be cinders. 
The demo didn’t go too well; the first samples crumbled to dust when touched. But the next attempt was better, to much amusement. Bake-off cum builders’ merchant and, to a cynic like me, this edit was the BBC’s attempt at pathos. Juxtaposing Israel’s ‘mighty’ innovation - turning water into wine - with Gaza’s plucky response in the face of adversity all wrapped up in a heartwarming, comical and humanising bit of film. So typical of the BBC.

The lady engineer had come back to Gaza, voluntarily ‘To help my people” “Hope! We will achieve our dream one day”.  
“The blockade here has devastated Gaza’s economy. Gaza now has among the highest unemployment rate in the world……..” says Simon. An unsuccessful fishing trip rounds off his visit to Gaza as an Israeli drone buzzes overhead.  

“It’s intimidating and frightening really” he remarks.

“Look, for young people in Gaza, the only thing know about the Israelis is that they are the occupier”
 reflects Rushdi.

“You don’t sound very hopeful for the future”
“The economic situation is hard and people are losing hope. They don’t have job. they don’t have money. The poverty is very high, the unemployment is more than 60 %.
There’s gonna be an exeblution. (!) (Explosion?) I think. But where I don’t know. When, I don’t know. But the possible of war? I don’t know. I think it’s 50%…. 50/50.”

Now for the most disingenuous bit of superficial philosophy in a summary that we’ve heard from the BBC’s go-to adventurous young travel presenter so far:

The situation here is utterly shocking and maddening. So much about the Arab Israeli conflict is about picking a side. 
And personally, I refuse to. 
My heart breaks for the suffering of the Jewish people, throughout history. 
My heart breaks for the suffering of the Palestinians.So many opportunities for real lasting peace have been lost here, and we see two sides - which seem in many ways to be moving further apart, not closer together.

So Simon’s poor heart is breaking. But for the Jews “throughout history” as per the school of Jeremy Corbyn  - not for the present-day Jews, Israelis who have endured endless cycles of violence from Gaza. Not for the Palestinians who have been corrupted by Islamic-rooted antisemitic hatred and indoctrinated by Hamas and misguided useful idiots from the west who perpetuate the conflict by fuelling the false hope of fulfilling their ‘dream’  - the annihilation of Israel and encouraging their belief in a fantasy. Their unique, moral and everlasting Right of Return to land they lost in their own self-inflicted wars.

The BBC hasn’t made much of it, but ever since June, balloons rigged with explosive and incendiary material have been launched from Gaza, setting fire to acres of Israel’s land and turning a child ’s toy into an instrument of terror. 
Hamas has intensified its violent demonstrations against Israel, turning the border between the Jewish state and the Gaza Strip into a "24/7" war zone as the terrorist group amps up its efforts to kidnap Israeli soldiers, according to Israeli security sources and regional reports. 
Hamas ramped up this past week its months-long violent demonstrations along the Gaza border as part of new plans to "kidnap soldiers so that it will have a bargaining chip to use against Israel for speeding up the removal of the blockade," according to an investigation into new ways Hamas is probing Israel's defenses provided by the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, or JCPA, a security research institute. 
Violence raged throughout the weekend and into late Monday, with some 20,000 Palestinians participating in the demonstration, which have grown increasingly violent as Hamas operatives begin to deploy explosive devices, grenades, incendiary balloons, and other makeshift weapons. 
Hamas's goal is create as much confusion and violence on the border as possible to elicit a response from the Israeli Defense Forces that could provide the terror group with an opportunity to kidnap soldiers. The renewed border violence is part of an effort by Hamas to test Israel's will and provoke a violent response.

When Simon was in Israel, he didn’t mention inconvenient accounts of Gaza's innovative enterprises like this one, H/T Vildechaye (via Facebook.)
"What does this look like to you? To my neighbors and I, we've had to retrain our kids that balloons are explosives.
Yeah, this is not a school project finding out how far a helium balloon can fly with a postcard at the bottom. This is an explosive balloon sent from Gaza that landed 38 kilometers away in my neighborhood, and that if touched, will explode for max impact.
This lovely gift was just sent to my 'hood from our friends in Gaza. They've sent thousands of these since the summer. The package at the bottom is an explosive device. Balloons like this have burned 1000 of acres of fields, 1000's of wild animals, hundreds of small businesses face financial ruin with their fields and crops destroyed. Yet the world is silent. 
Gazans wants peace? Gaza is Israel's problem? Gaza is a humanitarian disaster? BDS is the answer?
Well, here's a newsflash. We pulled out of Gaza 10 years ago. We destroyed 17 Israeli communities and the lives of thousands of families to do it. We did everything the world asked us to. Everything. We asked for one thing in return. Stop the terror against our cities. 
We've sent them more aid than any other location in the world has ever received (per capita). We continue to transfer aid in 18 wheel trucks every day. What does Gaza look like today? Abject poverty, minimized water and electricity (they attacked the plants we left them for both and ruined them --they've gotten billions and never built another), terror tunnels and thousands of missiles rained onto our cities. And last but not least, thousands of incendiary balloons.
What did y'all think would happen?
Were you expecting Kumbaya and a prayer circle?  
Gaza has proven time and time again it cannot lead itself out of this mess. Their leadership is corrupt. The majority of the aid money stolen. Their people suffer. But you asked us to disengage, so we tore up our country and did it. 
Now what?
Why balloons? Because they know the value we place on human life and our children. Hamas is once again targeting our children. On purpose. Explicitly. 
PS. In case you thought it was just explosives at the bottom...nope, they pack them with rat poison and nails for maximum damage when they explode. Oh, and even you can learn how to make one on YouTube. Because while a nursing boob is apparently offensive to humanity, instructions for how to make killer Gazan balloons don't appear to violate any community standards.
What next? I honestly have no idea.”

Simon refuses to pick sides. But ‘sides’ are not something you just ‘pick’. Only if you’re completely ignorant of the facts, past and present, can you see it as a mere matter of “picking sides".
I’d be very disappointed if James Delingpole thinks this episode of Simon Reeves's documentary demonstrates bravery or curiosity, and if Simon Reeve thinks he’s made a fair and even-handed documentary about suffering, he is deluding himself. On this particular topic, he’s shown us that he’s certainly not curious. He may be empathetic and tender and only a little sickmakingly mawkish, but Dellers is quite right about one thing - he is a complete TV natural. 

Saturday, 3 November 2018

Green cake and other stories


The BBC’s relentless pandering to the Palestinian ‘cause’ (eliminating Israel)  is encapsulated on this page. 

They’ve highlighted a vignette, first featured in Simon Reeve’s Mediterranean travels  - no, not Israel’s fantastic desalination plant - but some gushing propaganda about  “Green Cake” -  also noted here.


It’s a display of the BBC’s unadulterated anti-Israel emoting, side by side with various similarly themed items. 

The one about Palestinian forces torturing critics is unusually critical of something ‘Palestinian’, but unless you click on the link and follow through you might be misled by the scare quotes around ‘torturing critics’, not to mention the scare quotes surrounding ‘killed planting a bomb’ in another title.

These short video items clearly illustrate the BBC’s accelerated journey towards dumbed-down land.

Monday, 8 February 2016

A few observations to start the week

Have you taken up the MCB’s generous invitation to visit 80 Mosques? It was devised so that Muslims can explain their religion to us.
But why not offer open, spontaneous visits? Spot-checks if you like. Seriously, what’s the good of a pre-prepared presentation, or ‘pitch‘, like on Dragons Den.  
“Hello Dragons. My name is Abdel and I’m here today to show you why you need Islam. I want several million  con reverts and I’m offering nought percent of the business.”
 We don’t want to be given the run-around, do we? Not like Hans Blix and those procrastinating weapons inspections. Fobbed off. 
“No, you can’t come in today. It’s not convenient. Come back tomorrow when we’ve had a bit of a tidy up.” 
Undercover Mosque. Who could forget.

********

For some reason we’re not subjected to Mehdi Hasan on the BBC as often as we used to be. I haven’t seen him on QT or TBQs recently, have you? 
Maybe the BBC has noticed that he’s sub standard. Never mind, our loss is Al Jazeera’s gain. He has shows: “UPFRONT” and “Head to Head”. His interrogation technique is just up Al Jazeera’s street - childish, partial,  and unresponsive. 





Watch this “interview” with Israeli MK Tzipi Hotovely. Who does Mehdi think he is? Jeremy al-Paxman?
Funny thing is that that Marc Goldberg sees this differently. 
She (Tzipi Hotovely) has shot herself in the foot so many times that all he has to do is basically quote her statements back to her in order to make her and by extension Israel look like a bunch of land grabbing assholes”
Goodness me. I wouldn’t call ‘telling the truth’ “shooting yourself in the foot” - although it might seem that way if a) you don’t like the truth and/or  b) you’re not sure what the truth actually is. 


*******

This blog lacks a women’s page. We’ll be giving more beauty tips in future. And, you know, celebrity gossip and fashion.  Migrant-camp chic and so on. And asking questions on your behalf, such as: some voices on the radio are confusingly gender-fluid, but does it actually matter?

******

Did anyone watch Simon Reeve on BBC 2 last night? I did, and it was interesting. 
But why oh why did he have to keep wearing that wretched keffiyeh? 



Update:
Anonymous (one of the many) has brought a fascinating Al Jazeera related issue to our attention, see below. 
One thing you can say for Al Jazeera, you do sometimes get a thorough discussion on that channel. They often broadcast extensive statements and arguments by Israeli speakers even though they are usually outnumbered by pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel speakers.

This is a fascinating exposé by Israellycool 
Tommy Robinson, one of the organisers of Pegida UK, appeared on Al Jazeera this evening in a panel discussion. But this 3 minute clip includes the part Al Jazeera cut out. You’ll see why when you hear it. And all that follows a pretty pathetic trick the presenter tries to pull by switching the Koran for the Hebrew bible!
and Breitbart.  
WATCH: Al Jazeera ADMITS Editing Tommy Robinson Interview To EXCLUDE Criticism of Muhammed, Claims ‘Not Acceptable Broadcasting Standard’

The video is here - you can start at 14.00 or watch the whole thing on YouTube


Monday, 10 June 2019

Terrorist theme park



I happened to hear Loose Ends, (radio 4) which featured some amusing anecdotes by Dom Joly. He’s part Lebanese. I found the way the participants were joking affectionately and light-heartedly about Hezbollah and the ‘Hezbollah theme park’ grossly offensive.

I first saw and heard of this weird tourist attraction on the show 'Journey through the Med' starring Simon Reeve

Hezbollah is no laughing matter though. They are an Iran-backed terrorist organisation based in Lebanon, and they have infiltrated and overwhelmed the Lebanese government. 

Not only has Hezbollah placed about 160,000 rockets in Lebanon pointing towards Israel, ready to strike at the behest of the Ayatollahs, but in September 2015 a plot by Hezbollah-linked operatives to store explosive materials in London was foiled by the security services.

There was nothing small-scale about this endeavour. At the time, for some reason, we were not told about this. 
We can be sure that, without the bravery and expertise of our security services, many innocent lives would have been lost. Hezbollah’s desire to murder Jews, both in Israel and around the world, seems only to be limited by their capacity to kill.

Meanwhile, the BBC maintains its policy of strict impartiality, at least  where the enemies of Israel are concerned, so we can all continue to find Hezbollah and its war museum as amusing as the BBC appears to.

Sunday, 27 January 2019

Complaints, complaints


Minoan labyrinth, apparently modelled on the BBC's complaint process

I recently received an email from a reader who has battled the BBC's labyrinthine complaints process and won. 

It took a lot of perseverance, including a long exchange of letters with the BBC and an escalation to Ofcom, but, finally, out of the blue, the BBC capitulated and conceded the point of the complaint. 

So, if you're very patient and are prepared to jump through several BBC hoops, it can be done!


Indeed, here are a couple more recent examples. The first made me smile, as - like the above complaint - it obviously had to slog its way through the entire BBC complaints process to end up at the Executive Complaints Unit. I bet it took weeks, and yet all that was needed was for the BBC to acknowledge the error (a very basic error) and correct it. The wheels of the BBC complaints system grind very slowly at times: 


And the next one, on a heavier subject, concerns a report from BBC Arabic's Nida Ibrahim:


You may also like to read some of the BBC's latest Corrections and Clarifications (the first of which should be familiar to you!):

Wednesday 23rd January 2019: Question Time, BBC One and BBC Radio 5 live, 17 January 2019

A YouGov poll published on the day of the programme suggested a lead for the Conservatives but Diane Abbott was also right to say that some other polls suggested Labour either as ahead or tied, and we should have made that clear. We should normally report the findings of opinion polls in the context of trend and must always do so when reporting voting intention polls.

Thursday 17th January 2019: World at One, BBC Radio 4, 26 December 2018

We said that “over the past few decades… four fifths of Iraq's Christians have fled or been killed; in Israel and the Palestinian territories, as those following other religions have grown sharply in number, the Christian population has shrunk.” In the region as a whole, numbers are certainly continuing to fall. But in recent times Israel’s Christian population has increased - for example, in 2017, by 2.2%.

Thursday 10th January 2019: News at Ten, BBC One and BBC News Channel, 9 January 2019

The headlines reported the Prime Minister as saying that her plan was the only realistic one and the only way to avoid "crashing out" of the EU without a deal.
We should clarify this phrase was used in the debate by several MPs but not by the Prime Minister.

Friday 21st December 2018: Today, BBC Radio 4, 13 December 2018

It was said on the programme that the EU Referendum of 2016 was "the biggest vote in our country’s history".
In 2016 33.57 million votes were cast, including rejected papers.
More votes were actually cast in the 1992 General Election - a total of 33.61 million.  

Thursday 13th December 2018: News Channel, 15 October 2018

In a report about African Penguins and why their numbers are in decline we said conservationists say their natural habitats are being hit by rising tides caused by climate change. While studies show climate change is having an impact on penguin numbers, it is because of rising sea temperatures affecting fish stocks, rather than rising sea levels. Other factors include commercial fishing practices, which are making it more difficult for African Penguins to find enough to eat and survive. We apologise for the error.

Monday 10th December 2018: BBC London News, BBC One London, 4 December 2018

In a report on plans for a new Holocaust memorial in Westminster, we referred to Adampol as a ‘Polish labour camp’.
We regret any upset this resulted in - a clearer description should have been used, to explain that it was a Nazi German camp located in Poland.   

Thursday 29th October 2018: The World at One, BBC Radio 4, 2 August 2018

In a report on the history of the European Union, we said 10 new countries joined the 12 countries already in the EU in 2004. In fact there were 15 existing members by 2004, as Sweden, Finland and Austria had all joined in 1995.

Thursday 22nd November 2018: Today, Radio 4 and NewsHour, World Service, 30 October 2018

In a report about municipal elections in Jerusalem it was reported that Ramadan Dabash was on the ballot representing a Palestinian party and that this was a first. In fact this is not the case. A Palestinian candidate representing a Palestinian party also appeared on a ballot paper for the municipal council in 1998 and did not pass the voting threshold to win a seat. 

Thursday 15th November 2018: Mediterranean With Simon Reeve, BBC Two, 21 October 2018

While visiting Sicily, it was stated that San Cataldo church in Palermo had previously been a Mosque. This was not accurate. The site of the Palermo Cathedral would have been a better example to choose to illustrate the diverse history of the city.

Saturday, 12 January 2019

Belated Observations

When this blog was a mere twinkle in the eye, Craig and I got stuck over what to call it. We wanted to have the words “BBC” and “bias” in there, but as someone once said somewhere online, the “Biased-BBC” blog had already bagged the best name ever. Also, we wanted the title to sound less strident than “Biased-BBC” to imply that there was at least some room for doubt. We decided on a question rather than a statement, hoping it would encourage debate rather than produce a straightforward litany of anti-BBC ‘gotchas’. 

However, that was then and this is now. It’s now more or less a given that the BBC is biased, so we are lagging behind with our redundant ‘question’. I suppose we could reposition the ‘IS’ past “the BBC”, but that would be a boring statement of the bleeding obvious - and it would make us even more “Biased-BBC-lite” than we already are. So, for now, we’ll just leave the “is” and the “?” where they are. The status quo rules ok. 

*******

There is only one topic dominating the discourse - imagine what life will be like in the post-Brexit era (will there still be life?) and we’ll be able to settle back in and address the ishoos that occupied us in the olden days. Meanwhile, here’s Charles Moore (£)

Behind the incident of Anna Soubry being called a Nazi by a small group of Leave yobs beside College Green lies a classic Brexit sequence of events. For many months now, Remain protestors have infested that area. Their numbers are small, but they are well trained to insert themselves and their banners into relevant live television interviews, and have been praised by the Guardian for doing so. Never have I seen the BBC trying to exclude them from its shots, even when the protestors’ interventions have made it quite difficult for those being interviewed.
Sometimes BBC interviewers have gestured on air towards the protestors as evidence of strong pro-Remain public feeling. Often BBC cameras have used cutaways of them to punctuate news items, to make the same point. Not surprisingly, the BBC’s behaviour has in turn provoked Leave protests, because the indulgence of the Remain stunts has helped skew the news. As soon as this one looked nasty, the BBC turned it into a major story about hate crime, involving the police, fanned by Mr Speaker Bercow. It is certainly unpleasant and stupid to call almost anyone a Nazi, but the rudeness to Ms Soubry does not reach the threshold of a threat to public order or incitement to violence — not as bad, for example, as John McDonnell’s famous encouragement of those who said they wanted to lynch Esther McVey, or what happens in demonstrations by the Socialist Workers Party.
The wider truth is that College Green interviews are a circus invented by television 30 years ago to make its broadcasts from Westminster seem less boring. Circuses need performing seals, clowns etc. The cause of Remain — via the BBC — is the ring-master.

Excellent points, but one of the btl commenters took issue with the word ‘yobs’, and I do think it was quite naughty of the writer to use that term here as it smacks of the lazy stereotyping that’s routinely bandied about willy-nilly to save the bother of engaging with the actuality.

I must say the BBC’s obsession with Anna Soubry-gate was typical mountain-out-of-a-molehill reporting. That particular incident might have represented a kind of last straw where raucous heckling is concerned, but let’s face it, Anna did not look at all perturbed throughout. She was smiling. As many people have pointed out, this kind of stunt is commonplace these days, and it comes from (the extreme fringes of) all directions. And as Mr Moore says, the media eggs it on something rotten. 

*******

Since when has it become the norm to use the term ‘right-wing” as an insult, let alone "far-right"? Well, not so long ago the term might have conjured up an image of your actual Nazi, mistakenly, since actual Nazism emanated from the opposite direction. But I do see what they mean. They’re picturing your old fashioned misogynist, homophobic, hang-‘em and flog-‘em, sexually repressed, self-righteous, heard-hearted chauvinist pig. Illiberal, intolerant and racist. 
Of course, hardly any of the figures to whom that epithet is addressed are anything like that. The opposite. It’s usually the harshest opponents of a belief system that espouses those particular qualities at which the terms ‘right-wing, far-right and fascist” are hurled. Ironic, eh?

In fact, even dismissing something as ‘right-wing’ is understood to be almost (but not quite) as insulting and damning as being a ‘Zionist’.  You can shut down debate with these terms. Simple as. 

The BBC is bigging up the threat from the far-right for all it’s worth. Did anyone see Wyre Davies do a hilarious report about the couple who named their baby Adolf? Please tell me it was a spoof. Surely. I know it was aired a while back, but I’ve been busy.



******

A friend came round for lunch a couple of weeks ago. We don’t usually talk about politics, but it had just been announced that the responsibility for investigating the persecution of Christians had been handed to the Bishop of Truro, (our patch) and so the topic came up.

“So, who do you think is doing all this persecuting?”  asked someone. (me) 
“Well,” said Mr friend, thoughtfully. “In the Middle East? Hmm, probably Israel.” 
“Oh,” said I, “and you know this, how?” 
“Well,” said he, “In the papers and on the BBC?”
“I think you’ll find,” said I, “that this is not quite the case. Israel is about the safest place that the Christian community can be anywhere in the Middle East” 
His expression revealed the finality and obduracy of his belief  - “I heard it on the BBC” - so I knew I had to let it go.

At the time I was thinking that although I wouldn’t put it past the Guardian, I rather doubted that the BBC has said, explicitly and in so many words, that Israel, in particular, is one of the countries where Christians are being persecuted. After all, facts and figures are available.  (Who needs them?)

No. In my opinion, the Beeb’s relentless demonisation of Israel in general corrals people into the opinion that Israel is inherently racist and malevolent and therefore conclude that Israel must be guilty of persecuting Christians. Say no more. “We’ll lay the foundations; your imagination will do the rest.” In other words, I assumed that accusations of that kind are implicit, not explicit.

But that was before I saw this on BBC Watch, and as one of the btl commenters asserts: “…Christians in Israel are about the safest that the Christian community can be anywhere in the Middle East…” I hadn’t known about Jonny Diamond on TWATO then, but I know now. 



*****

I’ll just mention another item, again very belatedly.  Before Christmas - (around 17th December) I thought I heard Frankie Boyle reporting from Lebanon. Of course, it was actually Martin Patience describing some mysterious digger activity that he could see taking place in the distance, over in Israel. 
It was Hezbollah’s tunnels of course, being de-activated by the IDF. You know, the tunnels? Hezbollah’s attack tunnels that the whole wide world, apart from Martin Patience in Lebanon, are aware of? 
“Israel says,” began Martin Patience - as if not quite sure of the veracity of anything Israel says, or, for that matter, the existence of the tunnels.  Ok, so maybe being physically in Lebanon, one wouldn’t get the full picture. But he’s a reporter. He’s supposed to know what’s going on. Oh well, it must be easy to go to Lebanon and see only the good things like our smiley friend Ade Adeptan of The Travel Show who went there and didn’t notice Hezbollah at all. He must have missed The Hezbollah Museum, a well-known Lebanese tourist attraction. You know, the place where Simon Reeve went the other day. Instead, Ade spent some considerable time admiring a tourist attraction called Moussa Castle. 
 “How long did it take your favah to build this hideous castle?“ Ade Adepitan enquired of Ziad al Maamari, son of Moussa al Maamari who built it all himself. A lifetime’s achievement. 
(I did paraphrase, obvs.)


*******

Talking of venerable Scottish comedians, I liked Billy Connolly’s programme Made in Scotland.
He has mellowed and, I don’t know, matured and gone all philosophical.  Sorry that he’s ill. I have to admit, I used to find his gratuitous swearing a massive turn-off. Also, I’m not that keen on ‘stand-up” where ‘standing up’ is literally off the agenda, and furious pacing up and down the stage is the order of the day. It gets on my nerves and it’s often not pretty. Please be still! 

Anyway, at a certain stage, Billy Connolly discovered that he didn’t need to say anything amusing other than “fuck” to get a laugh out of the audience, and he got lazy. Strutting around swearing is not worthy. Not creative. However - there was a section in his Made in Scotland programme where he said something perceptive about swearing, which I really do get. Swearing can be witty, creative and uniquely expressive. ‘Jesus suffering fuck’ was an example. It’s the word ‘suffering’ that brings the expression to life and lights it up somehow. I appreciate the subtlety of that; the difference between an almost poetic verbal ejaculation and merely startling the audience with an expletive for a cheap laugh.  Poetic swearing is the kind of swearing I applaud.

Sorry I’ve lumped all these topics under the same roof., but I’m in a hurry.