Showing posts with label Simon Cox. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Simon Cox. Show all posts

Saturday, 7 March 2015

Who carries out anti-Semitic attacks in the UK?


White-North European - 44%
South Asian - 37%
Arab/North African - 10%
Black - 8%
White-South European - 1%
It appears, therefore, that the far-right accounts for around 45% of all anti-Semitic incidents, while the remaining 55% of attacks appear to have different, non-far-right motivation. 

What that other motivation might be emerges from another set of CST figures. These are drawn from the 453 cases where an ideological motivation or beliefs was identified alongside anti-Semitism. The the break down here runs as follows:

Anti-Israel/Islamist motivation or beliefs - 65%
Far-right motivation or beliefs - 35%

During July and August, however, when the conflict between Israel and Hamas was raging, the proportion of offenders looked like this:

South Asian - 50%
White-North European - 34%
Arab/North African - 12%
Black - 5%
White-South European - 0%

Radio 4's The Report was, therefore, giving a distorted and misleading impression of anti-Semitism in the UK.

Thursday, 5 March 2015

"Anti-Semitism in the UK: Is It Growing?"



Tonight's The Report on Radio 4 took a scary look at anti-Semitism in the United Kingdom:
Anti-Semitism in the UK: Simon Cox investigates the changing face of prejudice against Jewish people after recent lethal attacks in Paris, Copenhagen and Brussels. With the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, calling for European Jews to move to Israel, we look at whether there is more dangerous anti-Semitism online and on the streets of the UK. 
You might have been expecting to hear a lot about the threat from Islamists, but no...

The vast bulk of the programme was devoted to the far-right - from Combat 18 in the '80s and '90s to National Action and Joshua Bonehead in the 21st Century - and the programme did a good job of exposing these scumbags to the public eye (even though the Combat 18 bit seemed somewhat historical). 

It certainly didn't hold back from shaming these marginal creeps - even broadcasting some of the disgusting tweets sent to Labour MP Luciana Berger, and quoting some of their odious 'justifications'. 

Particularly shocking, however, were the experiences of Conservative MP Lee Scott. 

He receives regular anti-Semitic death threats - including ones that target him late at night in parliament after his staff have gone home. He needs a team of around five people to watch out for his safety when he makes certain public appearances. Here in Britain, in 2015.

Mr Scott's experiences came at the central point of the programme, midway through the section devoted to the far-right. 

In passing, however, it was mentioned that his abusers call him "an enemy of Islam". Quite who these Islam-defending abusers were wasn't speculated upon (Combat 18 leftovers? National Action? Bonehead? Someone else entirely?), and the focus on the far-right continued for a further nine minutes. 

With just five minutes to go, however, the (half-hour-long) programme suddenly changed tack. 

Presenter Simon Cox mentioned "a newer threat" to Britain's Jews. 

An advisor to the police and the government said that anti-Semitism is an "endemic", "deep-rooted", "engrained" problem in the Muslim community...

...at which point the fierce, 'brave' tone of the programme (towards the fringe nutjobs of the far-right) suddenly vanished, and the BBC's habitual, culturally-sensitive apologism took over.

Simon Cox quickly read out some of the excuses. He narrated the point that British Muslims have a harder time of it than British Jews, that they experience more attacks than British Jews [going, as statistical ignoramuses tend to do, for the bare totals and completely failing to relate them to proportions: i.e. to the much smaller proportion of Jews in Britain compared to Muslims], and that they suffer "Islamophobic" attacks on a "daily" basis. 

He also said that many might see the advisor's criticisms as "a misleading and inaccurate portrayal of their views". (The advisor, in response, conceded that their are plenty of positive examples of British Muslims behaving in a friendly fashion towards British Jews, but that the problem of Muslim anti-Semitism remains.)

And, having spent a mere three minutes on the dangers posed by Muslim Jew-hatred (despite Paris and Copenhagen - and in contrast to the 16 minutes devoted to the far-right), Simon then moved on, towards his closing remarks...

****

My closing remarks are this summary (which I emailed to Sue immediately after the programme, but which I know she won't mind me sharing):
'The Report' on Radio 4. It was about anti-Semitism in the UK. Most of it focused on the far-right. About three minutes were given to Muslim anti-Semitism, hedged with lots of caveats and several uses of the word "Islamophobic" - that Muslims are victims of more hate crimes than Jews, that they suffer abuse "daily". The anti-Semitism of the anti-Israel Left wasn't considered at all. 
Maybe I should just have left it at that.

Are we really to believe (pace the BBC here) that the main danger to Britain's small Jewish community comes from the rabid, marginal boneheads of the British far-right?



Update 6/3: Not a Sheep's take on this is well worth reading - and accords very closely with my own. His conclusions?:
So there we have it, a half hour BBC programme on the rise of anti-Semitism in the UK that manages just three minutes on the problem of anti-Semitism in the UK's Muslim community and counters that with the BBC presenter casting doubt on the veracity of those claims. Just another typical piece of BBC programming that protects Muslims from criticism even when that criticism is from a British Muslim expert. 
Also missing from this programme was any mention of the rise of anti-Semitism amongst the British left, especially at Universities and amongst the 'intelligensia'. But maybe investigating that source of anti-Semitism would be hitting too close to the BBC for their own comfort?

Sunday, 16 February 2014

Come to Sunny Gaza


The other day I heard this FOOC. “why might our man visiting the Gaza Strip be considering going back there, with his family, for a holiday?” trails Kate Adie. The FOOC web page was entitled “Come to Sunny Gaza”

“BBC man has a revelatory experience”  i.e. BBC man finds out that Gaza is not actually an open-air prison. 
I don’t know much about Simon Cox, so after a perfunctory Google I’d say he’s standard BBC issue. I won’t go into pointless speculation about whether his intentions were honourable or not. 

Seeing the web article made me think about it more. What was wrong with it? I should be pleased at least, that he had found out something that many of us had been saying all along. Hey everyone!  Gaza is not an open prison; but it was tinged with the obligatory innuendo about hardships, (unemployment, shortages of electricity) with the attendant sub-insinuation that these were all the fault of Israel.


This piece was entitled “Discovering Gazans’ resilient side.”  That has a resonance. 

“Resilient’ against hardship, obviously, and without any explanation of why there are hardships for Gazans it’s up to the reader to assume it’s all the fault of Israel. Or not. 

The gist of the piece is that Gazan would-be journalists are ‘just like us’. They’re war-weary and their concerns are mundane,  they wear jeans and trainers and brightly coloured headscarves.

For some reason Cox had been taken by surprise, as he was expecting something else. Something ‘scary’. He’d brought his flak jacket and helmet and been driven from the border with Israel in an armour-plated car past a plethora of grey breeze block structures, unfinished due to a lack of cement.”

Ah. Here we go. Lack of cement, eh. Those evil Israelis again. However the Gazans were bravely using their ingenuity to overcome their plight and aspiring to be journalists just like Simon.

So why, I wondered, hadn’t Simon known about the posh hotel, the ice-cream parlour and the supermarket? They’d been publicised over and over; on the interweb don’t you know.

Or, for that matter, it seems a bit odd, for a journalist who describes himself as ‘investigative‘ that he didn’t know much about Hamas? I mean, what with all these comedy videos and Youtube, he might have even stumbled upon, all about another menace, worse even than Hamas; and one that is establishing itself in the Gaza strip.


Maybe he did know, but had decided not to mention it?

Update.
Simon Cox didn’t mention the fact that Hamas controls all media based in the Gaza Strip. 

Read all about the training projects that support Radio Alwan, its links with the BDS movement and political organisations that oppose the two-state solution at BBCWatch.

BBC Watch quotes:
“The majority of media outlets in Palestine are based in the Gaza Strip. Since June 2007, Hamas loyalists have either shut down or assumed control of these outlets. As of August 2007, only two TV stations are currently available: Hamas’sss Al Aqsa and the Islamic Jihad’s Sawt Al Aqsa, and two radio stations: Al Qur-an Al-Kareem which is run by Hamas’ss Religious Affairs ministry, and Radio Alwan which is considered a pro-Hamas station.
Hamas has a large online presence and has seven leading websites that target an audience beyond the estimated 243,000 Palestinians with internet access, with its official website being served in a variety of languages including Arabic, Russian, French, Farsi, Urdu, and English. Hamas also has an online children’s magazine, which launched in 2002. The site features comics, poems, entertainment and stories celebrating the heroism of the shaheeds (martyrs for the sake of Allah).”


I wonder what Simon Cox thinks of the Hamas bunny?