Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts

Monday, 24 January 2022

A very sad story

This is a very sad tale of multiple tragedies.  My intention here is primarily to focus on the BBC’s conduct, but also to recount a bit of a story. 


Michael Rosen is one of the BBC’s most treasured contributors, and as Craig reminded me, his radio programme ‘Word of Mouth' is interesting and exceedingly listenable. 


He has broadcast several first-hand accounts of his near-death experience due to Covid-19 - the bad one - and has expressed his sincere gratitude to the NHS and explained how well they treated him.


He experienced a devastating personal loss several years ago when his eighteen-year-old son died suddenly of meningitis. He wrote so movingly of it at the time that I very well remember feeling deeply sorry for him and his family.


However, he is also a keen Corbynista, and I do recall the below-the-line contributions he made to Harry’s Place, back in the days when that was an ideologically left-leaning, and if you’ll pardon the anomaly, a pro-Zionist website. He was, back in the day, a bit of a troll, as his comments were somewhat provocative and, well, troll-like. Agent provocateur is the phrase I’m a-lookin' for.


Another red flag was raised (for me) when I noticed that Rosen was a fan of the self-confessed antisemite Roald Dahl, whose own family had to issue a posthumous apology on his behalf, in order to shift more of his merchandise. (Most kids, including mine, like Dahl’s stories. I think the stories have a bitter and twisted subliminal agenda,  but I did read them aloud to my own children - metaphorically hanging my own personal antipathy to the author on a peg at the bedroom door.


If you’re interested, Rosen was in a spat with TCW’s Laura Perrins in 2016 on the Beeb’s Daily Politics hosted by Jo Coburn, when the left-wing Momentum movement was more of a thing.




That roughly sets out my feelings about Michael Rosen. However, there is another and even sadder part to this unfolding tale. It gets bizarre. 


Michael Rosen saw something on Twitter he didn’t like. It was the kind of thing people do online, poking fun at people like Jeremy Corbyn by way of some nifty photoshopping. 


Someone on Twitter had doctored a picture depicting the magic grandpa apparently reading to some schoolchildren, originally a photo-op created to demonstrate Corbyn’s cuddly ‘Grandpa-ness. 

 

The book in the Tweet had attracted Rosen’s attention because it was Rosen’s own popular Bear Hunt-themed children’s book - but with a twist. The book’s cover had been substituted for another image - The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion - and, obviously to everyone but Rosen, intended as a dig at Corbyn’s antisemitism.


Rosen didn’t see the joke. He took umbrage, bigly. Not only that, but he somehow interpreted the Tweet itself, and therefore the tweeter, as being antisemitic. As to how he worked that out, nobody has so far offered a credible explanation. As far as I can tell, it was a massive inversion of the actualité and if anything, a combination of gaslighting and self-denial.


This is where the BBC comes in. Last May, the BBC put out an article on their website. 

Michael Rosen condemns Northumbria Uni lecturer's manipulated image tweet,  illustrated with a jokey pic of Rosen peering smilingly through two huge piles of his books.




The article is sparse. It doesn’t name Rosen’s accusé, but alludes to him as “Northumbria Uni lecturer.”


The content of the article implies that the Uni Lecturer is an antisemite and Rosen’s ridiculous accusation is reproduced in the form of a quote. 

The book's author, Michael Rosen, has condemned the tweet as "loathsome and anti-Semitic". The member of staff has been approached for comment

The BBC is careful to stress that Rosen is “not in favour of anyone being sacked over this”.


Whatever you make of this poorly constructed article, it certainly lacks logic and is so badly explained that it leaves an impression diametrically contra to the actuality.


Although Rosen was gratuitously magnanimous about the sacking, the University in question did what universities as employers do these days; they dealt with it with predictable unsupportiveness and wokeness typical of present-day academia. 


So now the University Lecturer is dead. We are not aware of what has happened but one can speculate. He was 38 years old for God’s sake.



Peter Newbon received hate mail and was bullied online in wake of tweet about Jeremy Corbyn


A coroner will investigate the sudden death of a Jewish academic “remorselessly bullied” on social media after he was accused of anti-Semitism by one of Britain’s best loved children’s authors. 

Peter Newbon, 38, a father of three young girls, died a week ago in the wake of a Twitter “pile on” that had left him feeling under pressure, according to friends. He was found dead last Saturday. 

His partner, Rachel Hewitt, said his death had left her “broken into a million unbearably painful pieces”. 


“Through his work as a senior lecturer in the humanities at Northumbria University, which he joined in 2012, Pete inspired students with his passion for Romantic and Victorian literature. 

"In his political campaigning, particularly against anti-Semitism in Labour, he showed bravery, integrity, and a fierce sense of right and wrong. His friends have told me they loved his gentleness, goodness and irrepressible humour.”  


The North Yorkshire and York coroner court is due to open an inquest at a later date.





I’m sure Michael Rosen feels pretty bad now. One hopes so. But the BBC hasn’t quite got round to reporting this tragedy yet, and one does wonder how they’ll pitch it, when and if they do.

Saturday, 4 December 2021

Update on a wayward BBC tweeter


We noted on Wednesday that the BBC's Executive Complaints Unit ruled against Megha Mohan, the BBC World Service’s first gender and identity correspondent, for a tweet on the transgender issue. They ruled against her for failing to comply with BBC guidance saying “Staff should also not post offensive or derogatory comments or content on social media and avoid abusing their position as a BBC employee in personal interactions”. And now this highly prolific BBC tweeter has deleted her Twitter account. If you click on @meghamohan now you'll get the message This account doesn’t exist. I'm wondering if she's still the BBC World Service’s gender and identity correspondent.

Tuesday, 23 November 2021

More Twitterings [featuring talk of BBC editorial guidelines]


I know that political Twitter is often a blood sport, and that only a surprisingly small minority of the public ever bothers with Twitter at all, but it a favourite haunt of many of my least favourite BBC journalists. 

And do you get delightful cat videos and opportunities to vote on whether the 3-voice, 4-voice or 5-voice mass settings by your favourite Tudor composer you prefer.

One quirk of my Twitter feed is that, over the years, I've 'followed' the following four people: James Delingpole, Maajid Nawaz, Sunder Katwala and Shayan Sardarizadeh. 

You may know them all already [especially as they've all featured on the blog before], but I'll introduce them nonetheless: 

James is a conservative who thinks nearly everything being done in the name of Covid and climate change is a scam. Maajid is an ex-Muslim extremist turned Lib Dem broadcaster who shares some of James's takes. Sunder is a left-liberal think tanker who really doesn't like Maajid. And Shayan is an impartial BBC journalist from  Mike Wendling's BBC Trending/BBC Disinformation Unit with a strong interest in QAnon who works alongside the famous Marianna Spring and often 'likes' in tandem with her on Twitter. 

I'm happy to follow all of them, being broad-minded, even though all four of them irritate me from time to time. I like to hear what interesting people like this are saying. So this today is like a rare astronomical conjunction of planets as it features all four of them together:
There's James doing his thing, and jumping more sharks than Evel Knievel doubling for The Fonz in a David Attenborough documentary about sharks. 

And there's Sunder doing his thing and bullying Maajid for being guilty by association. 

And there's Shayan, the impartial BBC guy, doing his thing and impartially taking sides on the same side he always takes by 'liking' Sunder's attack on Maajid and James.

What are they like!

Of course, James Delingpole, Maajid Nawaz and Sunder Katwala aren't bound by the BBC's guidelines on impartiality. They can 'like' what they want, unlike Shayan Sardarizadeh. 

Those pesky BBC editorial guidelines don't stop Shayan though!

Tim Davie can 'talk the talk' as much as he likes about BBC staff's impartiality-busting on social media because the BBC's been promising to clean it up its act on that front for years now, and yet here we are again. 

Saturday, 9 January 2021

A Twitter Tale, starring Evan Davis


Twitter feeds have become a hot topic today, what with tech giant Twitter's private owners "permanently suspending" the present US president, the famous Donald Trump. 

I don't think that my Twitter feed is anything like an echo chamber. I deliberately try to avoid making it so. I follow leftwingers and rightwingers, pro-Brexit and anti-Brexit people, pro-lockdowners and anti-lockdowners, people who liked Level 42 and people who didn't like Level 42 (like Rob Burley), cat people and dog people, anti-BBC people and pro-BBC people, etc.

Doing so can occasionally raise my blood pressure, but it also keeps me aware of other points of view. 

(I'll confess to breaking down just once. I unfollowed one person last year: Newsnight's hyperactive, intolerably hyper-biased Lewis Goodall. I did so purely for health reasons. He was making me sick. He was much, much too much.) 

Today, on my timeline, has been notable for three people I follow - LBC's Maajid Nawaz (who I mostly agree with), British Future's Sunder Katwala (who I sometimes agree with)  and the BBC's Evan Davis (who I never again with 😜) - getting involved in a discussion.

Actually, I say 'discussion', but it was mainly Sunder and Evan chatting about Maajid behind his back.

*******

Right, so for those new to the Twitter soap opera......

Maajid was the former Islamist radical who abandoned Islamism, became a Lib Dem and then embarked on a successful non-BBC radio career where he said all sorts of things that right-wingers like.

Sunder is a thoughtful, left-leaning blogger and activist of the pro-immigration variety. 

And Evan is a BBC presenter with an especial thing for the Paddington Bear movie.

Sunder has been going after Maajid, pretty much daily - relentlessly - sending out dozens of tweets most days for months, now totally many hundreds at least, slamming Maajid personally for his views on the US election, and, to a lesser extent, coronavirus - because (among other things) Maajid has backed those alleging voter fraud and election rigging in the US election.

Today Evan Davis stepped in, possibly to rescue Sunder from his near 24/7 obsession with the misguided LBC presenter.

(All this Twitter stuff might be boring you rigid, but please hang on for Evan's point of view...)

Sunder had, as is his way, been getting into his quotidian stride this morning (nightgown off, suit on) and posting tweet after tweet after tweet attacking (bullying?) Maajid again, once again, and again some more, over the LBC man's highly sceptical, non-Marianna-approved views on the validity of the US election result.

Evan DavisSunder, there is literally no-one on Twitter I respect more than you... 
I take daily guidance on what to think about things by observing what you say. But I wonder whether you (and many others) give too much attention to cranky views and conspiracies. Can't we just ignore them?

Sunder posted four replies, including a graph, justifying himself, but Evan replied again:

Evan DavisAs always, you are thoughtful and reasonable on this. But when it comes to crazy views, I worry most about the potential for discourse and argument to cement opinions rather than change them

So, stepping back and goggling afresh...

The BBC's Evan Davis (a) says he "respects...literally no-one...more than you" to very possibly the most ultra-mainstream, left-liberal, pro-immigration, 'very BBC' person I follow. (Truth or politeness?). 

He then (b) slurps that he takes "daily guidance on what to think about observing what you say" to the same 'very BBC' pundit. (Truth or politeness?).

It wouldn't surprise me. Sunder's way of thinking is, indeed, very BBC. That Evan hangs on his every word daily would be a very BBC thing to do.

Note, above all, that Evan is advising Sunder to "ignore" the likes of Maajid Nawaz. (That's Evan's main point here.) And he's doing so because he, Evan Davis, clearly also disapproves of Maajid's "cranky views and conspiracies".

Like Samira Ahmed, Evan Davis then evidently advances the line that airing and arguing and discussing such "crazy views" as those expressed by Maajid about the US election are something to "worry" about.

"Discourse" and "argument" thus become problematic -  things with "the potential...to cement opinions rather than change them". 

Evan seems to be calling for the censoring of certain kinds of "discourse" and "argument" here, doesn't he? Shush!!!

Such censorship of people with 'wrong' views has a long BBC pedigree.

As for Sunder Katwala, I suspect he'll ignore Evan. He's a man on a mission to 'Get Maajid'.

Friday, 29 May 2020

Salford, we have a problem


The Times reports today that the BBC is so concerned about their journalists discrediting them by expressing their views on Twitter that they've now hired their former head of news, Richard Sambrook, to look into the problem. 

Mr Sambrook was, you may recall, the co-author of a much-cited, BBC-backed Cardiff University report which 'found' that the BBC didn't just not have a pro-EU bias but 'actually' has a pronounced anti-EU bias. His own Twitter feed reveals him to be anti-Brexit

Wonder what he'll find and recommend?

Wednesday, 27 May 2020

Lewis Goodall stands up for Emily Maitlis


Lewis Goodall is clearly somewhat emotional tonight. He's just tweeted:
So much to say but best to leave it for now given, for obvious reasons, certain people want nothing more than to have a debate about the media. Instead, will just say I couldn’t be prouder to work on BBC Newsnight, a world class programme with a world class presenter, Emily Maitlis.
Lots of people are telling him how much they admire him and encouraging him to keep his chin up and looking at their Twitter bios it's very striking how many of them bear descriptions like "Socialist", or "pro-EU", or "appalled at self harm of Brexit", or "member of the Labour Party", or "anti-Johnsonian", or "Guardian", or have spider emojis. It's an overwhelming trend in fact. 

What is it, do you think, that they so admire in Lewis Goodall?

Update 23:05: Meanwhile, even while Newsnight is being broadcast, he's still actively 'liking' and re-'liking' criticism of the BBC's ruling, including the one cited earlier branding the corporation "spineless". He's deliberately courting trouble I think. 

Tuesday, 19 May 2020

Stooshie Time



The BBC's Scotland Editor Sarah Smith (daughter of the former Labour leader John Smith) felt compelled to recant her words on last night's BBC One News at Ten no less than four times today.

Today she dressed herself in non-literal sackcloth and ashes, but last night on the BBC she had her equally-non-literal party frock on and an unfortunately literal laugh in her voice and said this:
The Scottish Government are planning to publish a document, a route map, on Thursday this week, which will outline how they plan to cautiously and gradually ease some lockdown restrictions, but no changes will actually be introduced until the 28th of May at the earliest. So it will be the end of the month before people in Scotland can sit in the park, play a game of golf or tennis, visit a garden centre or maybe even restart some outdoor work like on construction sites. And the Scottish Government say that, like all of the UK nations, they base their advice on expert advice that they are given and that it has got nothing to do with politics, but it has been obvious that Nicola Sturgeon has enjoyed the opportunity to set her own lockdown rules and not have to follow what's happening in England and other parts of the UK. The gamble is whether people will continue to support her taking a different path when they are living under more stringent restrictions than other people in the UK.
Her first pair of contrite tweets came after Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon took to Twitter to respond to an SNP supporter's tweet railing against Sarah's "shameful" report, with Ms Sturgeon responding:
Never in my entire political career have I ‘enjoyed’ anything less than this. My heart breaks every day for all those who have lost loved ones to this virus.  
Two hours after Ms Sturgeon's tweet, the BBC's Sarah replied:
I do not believe that Nicola Sturgeon is enjoying this crisis. I had meant to say on the ten o’clock news that she has “embraced” the opportunity to make a policy unique to Scotland. I said “enjoyed” by mistake. Not suggesting she is enjoying crisis but embracing devolution. 
On last night’s News at Ten I said Nicola Sturgeon had “enjoyed the opportunity to set her own lockdown rules”. I should have said she was “embracing” the opportunity to set a separate policy for Scotland. I never meant to suggest she is enjoying this crisis. Of course she is not.
Nicola Sturgeon then responded:
I’ve made clear my view on this report. I’m not ‘enjoying’ or ‘embracing’ an ‘opportunity’. I’m just doing what I judge best in very difficult circumstances. That said, I understand the scrutiny that comes with it and accept Sarah’s clarification. For me, the matter is closed. 
And Sarah Smith replied with two more strongly apologetic apologies:
For the avoidance of doubt, I am sorry that by mistake I said last night that Nicola Sturgeon was “enjoying the opportunity” to set a different policy. 
For the avoidance of any doubt. I am sorry that by mistake I said on the news last night that Nicola Sturgeon was “enjoying the opportunity” to set lockdown policy in Scotland. That was not what I meant to say and I apologise to her for my error.
All's well that ends well then? The BBC's Sarah Smith misspoke. First Minister Nicola Sturgeon objected. The BBC's Sarah Smith 'clarified' what she'd said. First Minister Nicola Sturgeon accepted Sarah's 'clarification'. The BBC's Sarah Smith then apologised twice more. All very civilised. 

That's not how everyone sees it though. (This is Twitter after all).

I'm seeing two diverging lines of dissention: 

The first, reflected in the 'trending' hashtag #sackSarahSmith, came from the usual hordes of angry, ultra-loyal cybernats. Unlike the canny Ms Sturgeon, many of them aren't for forgiving the daughter of a former unionist Labour leader, or the 'pro-union' BBC. They want Sarah's metaphorical head - i.e. for her to be sacked - and brand it as deliberate bias.

Meanwhile, some on 'our side' of the Twitterowebosphere think that Sarah Smith was right all along and have smelt metaphorical knuckle dusters from the SNP - and equally metaphorical grindingly repentant kissings of the Godmother's ring from the cowardly BBC. They think it is obvious that Nicola Sturgeon of the SNP has been enjoying the opportunity to set her own lockdown rules and are amazed at the BBC for apologising when they were actually, 'for once', right.

Partisans must do what partisans must do, alas. So: Did Sarah Smith misspeak, or did she report fairly and state the plain truth, or did she betray anti-SNP bias? And was she right to apologise or wrong to apologise? 

Saturday, 9 May 2020

Getting things into perspective



Cosham, a suburb of Portsmouth, has been trending on Twitter today - and not in a good way. 

It came about after a live report on last night's BBC One News at Six, a report from Duncan Kennedy showing the inhabitants of one of Cosham's UK-flag-festooned avenues enjoying their VE Day street party, and singing war-time songs, and getting it together - at a safe distance. 

I saw wine glasses on walls, and sunshine, and families having fun, and a woman celebrating her 75th birthday that very day.  

But soon metaphorical clouds arrived like frowns, all thanks to the unforgiving medium of Twitter. 

Yes, a backlash was brewing.

A screenshot was shared far and wide. It showed the patriotic street partiers standing behind the BBC's Duncan Kennedy and waving and cheering.

Now, it must be said that they did look rather close together, so...

...Cue uproar on Twitter.

Uproar, of course, quickly translated into the usual mass outpouring of bile, bordering on hatred, all directed against the happy people of Cosham - and also against the BBC for promoting such flagrant disregard for the lockdown guidance. 

Golden rule: Never just believe what you see on Twitter. 

I looked into it (via TV Eyes) and saw the report. The BBC newsreader and the BBC reporter went out of their respective ways to say that everyone in the report was obeying the social-distancing rules - it was said three times in fact - and other camera angles showed precisely that: family groups keeping apart while coming together to mark VE Day and to pose for the BBC's  cameras. 

So, to put it simply, that controversial screenshot was simply a trick of perspective. The whole Twitterstorm wasn't even worth calling a storm in a teacup. It was a fake storm.

As you'd expect from Twitter, not everyone was unaware of that, but, nonetheless, some of the critics who evidently knew as much still carried on regardless - something I put down to them enjoying their latest two-minute hate far too much to just let it go.

Examining the critical tweets, it's clear that many were criticising the folk of Cosham on Piers-Morganite grounds. They'd seen the screengrab, read the outraged tweets, failed to step back and think, and leapt on the bandwagon brandishing their pitchforks against the lockdown deniers. But a large minority went further and displayed an Emily Thornberry-style snobbery, with some even piling in with violent wishes against people they seem to regard with total contempt.

I know next to nothing about the suburbs of Portsmouth, so I looked. Cosham is a Conservative/UKIP/Brexit-Party-voting suburb of the city. I suspect many of the nastier elements commenting on Twitter didn't even check, just assumed from the flags, and the patriotic songs, and the working class voices that these were lockdown-breaking, knuckle-dragging, Brexit-supporting creatures. Hence the added ferocity of their pile-on.

But, as couldn't be clearer these days, Twitter isn't the UK, and I suspect that the vast majority of those watching the actual BBC bulletin, and seeing the footage, and hearing the words, and taking in the point from the BBC newsreader and the BBC reporter that everyone on the street was observing social distancing guidelines, will have taken the people featured in it for what they actually are - people who like their country and their neighbours - and liked them too.

Tuesday, 18 February 2020

More questions


Mark Wallace of ConservativeHome had a question - and a pair of paradoxes:
How can it be appropriate, impartial or within BBC rules for senior journalists at the Corporation to use BBC-branded Twitter accounts to promote political campaign material claiming "The government have declared war on our BBC" and comparing the PM to Donald Trump?

The BBC: We are deeply loved by the public. Also the BBC: Funding us by voluntary subscription would destroy the BBC.

The BBC: We are impartial and take no part in political campaigning. Also the BBC: Sign this petition attacking the govt for suggesting voluntary subscription!

Sunday, 2 February 2020

What's the point, Piers?



The Twitter mob is marching out with torches and pitchforks out this morning because Nigel Farage was on The Andrew Marr Show. 

Despite serving for over 21 years as an elected MEP and being the most influential politician in modern British political history, these fiery furies really don't think the BBC should invite him on. At all.

Yes, Nigel Farage only got a walk-on (or sit-down) part on the sofa this morning, sitting alongside a former Lib Dem advisor during the paper review, while the ex-President of the European Council Donald Tusk got the long, final interview. But even that's too much for them.

Piers Morgan has tried, but seriously, Piers, what's the point?
Piers Morgan: Nigel Farage was calm, measured, reasonable & non-gloating on #Marr - so of course, illiberal liberal Twitter is losing its hysterical sh*t yet again & howling abuse about him. The perpetually furious woke brigade will never win an election until they learn to stop doing this.
Amanda AbuBakr-Poole: He's a fascist , do your homework!
Piers Morgan: Farage is not a fascist. Ironically, the new fascism is the illiberal left constantly branding everyone with a different opinion ‘fascist’.

Saturday, 1 February 2020

Lewis and his public



Lewis Goodall, Newsnight's policy editor, marked the moment of Brexit with an elephant:
Half a century of history is over. New chapter about to begin. Only thing that’s certain about it is its uncertainty. We joined the EEC partly because we weren’t sure what role to play in the world political and economic order. We’ve now got to answer that question afresh. 
Next: huge negotiations between the UK/EU in the next 11 months. Problem for Britain: the elephant in the room, rarely acknowledged publicly by British politicians: the relative economic power imbalance between the two sides. It may become more obvious in the months to come.
As he wrote this on Twitter he received plenty of audience feedback, most of it of the following kind:
  1. Check the balance of trade sh*thouse.
  2. How about the fact they sell a huge amount more to us than vice versa and still want to do so?
  3. I bet Goodall is a laugh a minute at parties.
  4. Par for the course. Pro EUers portraying the EU as holding all the aces in negotiations and UK at their mercy. Very much not the case. The failing EU needs a good trade deal with UK and not a competitor on its doorstep.. The UK has a strong hand and Boris will play it
  5. When is Newsnight getting dumped?
  6. For once, just once, stop being an EU stooge.
  7. Bugger off. BBC bias plain for all to see. Scrap the licence fee!
  8. As ever you are playing the role of the EU. Power is not always in the BIG. Your usual BBC bias is so obvious: let's end the licence of bias!
  9. Actually the elephant in the room is the trade imbalance between the U.K. and the EU and especially or thankfully with Germany.
  10. Yes Lewis we know the debt and fiscal struggles in the EU given the economic imbalance in their nation states. I’m sure we’ll give them a good enough deal though. Don’t worry.
  11. The real elephant in the room is the trade imbalance - in our favour. Your lack of intelligence is breathtaking.
  12. You're the only elephant in the room so just jog on.
  13. Are you even going to attempt balance?
  14. Conveniently forgot the near 100 billion trade deficit I see!!! And you call yourself a economic reporter.
  15. Apart from Andrew Neil the BBC's political pieces and journos wouldn't know unbiased reporting if it hit em in the face.
Many were a lot ruder.

Thursday, 9 January 2020

Sarah Montague wouldn't approve


(h/t Guest Who)

Some 16 hours ago the BBC's media editor tweeted the following:
Scoop: John Humphrys is joining the Daily Mail as a columnist. My very distinguished former colleague, who left @BBCr4today in September after 32yrs, starts on Saturday. Replaces Peter Oborne. Will range beyond politics. Suspect BBC will be in his sights from time to time!
He when then visited by a multitude of not-so-heavenly Corbynistas and FBPEers, so 2 hours ago he tweeted again:
If you want proof that, from a low base, Twitter has got so much worse so quickly of late, I recommend combining acclaimed BBC journalists and The Daily Mail in a single tweet. Btw on a point of information he voted Remain, and wrote a Sunday Times column for many years.
(For those wondering about the meaning of the title of this post, in his book John Humphrys revealed that his then colleague Sarah Montague "gave him a hard time" for reading The Daily Mail.)

Sunday, 5 January 2020

Twitter ye not!


According to The Sunday Telegraph's Christopher Hope, "several" BBC executives have told the paper that "the BBC's top journalists" are to be "summoned" and "given advice" about their use of social media platforms like Twitter. They will be "urged" to rein in their tweeting about politics. The paper mentions Huw Edwards, John Simpson and Emily Maitlis by name.

One "senior BBC executive" is quoted saying:
Too many people within the BBC use it as their own vanity project to get their own views out... It becomes an echo chamber that attracts more and more anger. We have talked about looking at that.

Monday, 30 December 2019

Strange Fruit cake

While Craig is busy with non-blogging issues you’ll have to endure another niche post. I make no further apology - not that ‘endure’ and ‘niche post’ amount to an actual apology. 

While our backs were turned - while my back was turned - ex-BBC employee and more recently ex UNRWA chief / honorary member of Hamas, Chris Gunness, has been busy ranting on Twitter!




Israel Hayom has also reported this bizarre poetic outburst. 
Former UNRWA rep attacks Netanyahu in bizarre Christmas-themed Twitter rant
Chris Gunness, who left the UN's Palestinian refugee agency earlier this year, spent his Christmas eve writing holiday-themed parodies mocking Israel. 
To the tune of ‘Santa Claus is Comin’ to Town’(?)  
To Mr. Netanyahu 
You better watch out, you better not cry
You better not pout, I’m telling you why,
The ICC is coming to town.
They know you’ve done some war crimes
They know you you’ve been corrupt,
They know you’ve sanctioned settlements
You are absolutely f*****.”
Next: a weird parody of Twas the night before Christmas apparently revelling in the gruesome punishments meted out by Hamas to collaborators-with-the-enemy.
Twas the night before Christmas, when all across The Strip
Not a Qasam Rocket crackled, under Israel’s tight grip.
Collaborators twitched as they hung in the air
On the lamp posts that glistened in Palestine Square
— Chris Gunness (@ChrisGunness) December 23, 2019
I wouldn’t normally bother to reiterate gossip about this person, but I couldn't resist when I saw that he went to the same school as Ian Hislop - at the same time!
“Gunness was born in 1959 in what was then the Crown Colony of Trinidad, part of the British West Indies. He was educated in England, initially at Ardingly College, before gaining a scholarship in 1979, to Oxford University. He was a contemporary of Ian Hislop at both institutions”
"He joined the BBC as a graduate trainee in 1982. During his 23-year career in broadcasting, he covered all the following roles: producer, studio manager, reporter, correspondent and anchor. 
Here at ITBB we have written about him more than once. He treachery was particularly visible during one (or more) of Israel’s incursions into Gaza when he turned a blind eye to Hamas’s human shield type strategy of hiding weapons in UNRWA schools.
The most bonkers example of his erratic behaviour is his notorious emotional meltdown that can be seen in this post.
 He really is one of the strangest individuals ever to have been on the BBC’s payroll. 

Sunday, 22 December 2019

Robbie Gibb's Little List - a further discussion


The conversation continues:
David Aaronovitch: There’s a lot to recommend several of your points Robbie. But if you were to critique them yourself, where do you think the weaknesses or complexities in your own checklist are?
Robbie Gibb: I’m not sure people truly understand impartiality - as you know it’s not just about balance. It requires broadcasting extending its gene pool of staff to include diversity of background and political views (as well as gender and ethnicity). It could take years.
Jill Jervis: Definitely no impartiality on TV or newspapers this GE. In fact there was nothing but pure lies about Labour & no critic of Cons so the sooner the better TV licence goes.
David Aaronovitch: Jill, how do you explain to yourself that Tories and Brexiteers seem just as convinced that broadcasters are totally biased against them? And if your explanation is that they’re mistaken then isn’t it just as possible that you are?
Peter Lamb: This argument that "everybody criticises us so we must be doing a good job' is way over used and fails the most basic scrutiny. A classic case of BS baffles brains.
David Aaronovitch: That’s not my argument.
Peter Lamb: My concern is that an assumption that criticism is symmetrical and of equal merit tends to encourage exaggeration. We now observe intense criticism of the BBC and others. Is it possible that this is amplified by the casual dismissal of criticism under the balance defence?
David Aaronovitch: Possibly, but I don’t think that’s a primary factor.
Robbie Gibb: It is possible that broadcasters can be biased against the right and left at different times. My argument is things need to change to prioritise impartiality starting with twitter and broadcast interviews.
Alistair Stewart: There is also the tricky issue of broadcast reporters being one thing 'on-air' - balanced & impartial - and believing they have can have another personae on social media - the partisan lobbyist. They are the same person, with the same duties.

Saturday, 21 December 2019

Robbie Gibb's Little List


Robbie Gibb, Rob Burley's predecessor at the BBC before he became Theresa May's Director of Communications, has today posted a checklist of what, in his view, needs to be done to improve impartiality and accuracy in reporting. I have to say that I think it's a superb list and the BBC should study it carefully. Many of its journalists break these 'rules' on an almost daily basis: 
Ch4’s decision to ban nonpolitical journalists from tweeting about politics is a step in the right direction and other broadcasters should follow its lead. However there is so much more that needs to be done to improve impartiality and accuracy in broadcasting. My checklist: 
1) Always make impartiality the number one priority or it will take second place to other considerations.
2) On social media and broadcast it should not be possible to work out any journalist’s political views.
3) On Twitter look at your tweets in the round, check they don’t all point in one direction.
4) Never like or retweet partisan comments that lean either left or right.
5) Ask yourself: am I providing a service that will be as congenial to a Telegraph reader as a Guardian reader.
6) You can’t be both an impartial journalist and commentator - choose one or the other.
7) Only say what you actually know. Journalists should apply the same standards of accuracy and fact checking on Twitter as they do on broadcast.
8) Don’t pretend you can predict the future - you can’t and your guess isn’t news.
9) Show some humility - you probably don’t know as much as the person you are criticising.
10) Don’t judge the success of an interview by retweets. It will distort how you conduct the interview.
11) Audiences want to know what’s going on, not just what’s going wrong.
12) The role of interviewer is to ask the questions the audience would ask if they had the chance. It should not become a game designed to embarrass the politician or raise the profile of the presenter.
13) Programme editors should constantly ask themselves will this running order look fair and reasonable to viewers with different political views to their own.
14) Avoid group think and metropolitan bias by regularly talking and listening to people outside the bubble.
15) Avoid loaded language, it gives away your bias.
16) In a democracy there are many ways politicians are held to account, not least in Parliament. So not every interview has to be the Spanish Inquisition.
17) There are lots of media outlets wanting to interview politicians. Programmes must avoid a sense of entitlement - you can’t always get what you want.
18) Empty chairing guests should only be done in exceptional circumstances & programmes should avoid becoming part of the story.
19) Presenters and reporters should avoid speaking engagements (paid or unpaid) where there could be a perceived conflict of interest.
20) Impartiality applies to everything, not just politics. Just because you think your opinion is common sense doesn’t mean you can express it on broadcast.
21) All broadcasters are covered by the Ofcom code on accuracy and impartiality. Understand that and act accordingly.

Don't Be Rude To Owen Jones Day


New blog favourite Lewis Goodall, who's just finished at Sky News and will be starting at Newsnight in the new year, has just recently published a mysterious tweet:
Oh I see Twitter is engaged in some mass organised bullying today. Great job everyone! Merry Christmas.
So who's being bullied today? I've no idea, but before I look and see I'm guessing it's not going to be a right-winger on the receiving end of Lewis's sympathy.

OK, I'm off to have a look....

Hmm, it's Owen Jones. A very crude, cruel hashtag about him (please don't click on the link) is trending at No.1 in the UK. 

Wednesday, 11 December 2019

Unfolding in the past few minutes on Twitter....


Guido Fawkes 26m: EXCLUSIVE Tory Activist Attacked with Acid in Barnet.
Dan Hodges 12m: Given what happened yesterday, people need to be careful of reports coming from Barnet until all the facts are established.
Dan Hodges 8m: Tory sources saying not yet clear what substance was involved in Barnet incident, but it wasn't acid.
Dan Hodges 1m: Appears the substance involved was perfume.
Update: And then came this:
Dan Hodges 9m: Appears the substance involved was perfume.
Isaac 4m: You got your info from this Shit blog, didnt you? (linking to Guido Fawkes).
Dan Hodges 3m: My info on what?
Isaac 2m: The so called Acid Attack.
Dan Hodges 1m: I didn't say there had been an acid attack. I said there hadn't been an acid attack. Could you please go back to the WhatsApp group and get your lines straight please.
(You may not be surprised to learn that Isaac is a supporter of Jeremy Corbyn).

Another update: And then came this:
All of which, I think, calls for a cry of 'Good grief!'.

Monday, 9 December 2019

Cakes, to have and to eat


The BBC's Editor of Live Political Programmes, a certain Rob Burley (who we may possibly have mentioned here before, from time to time, once in a blue moon), is issuing a heartfelt plea tonight:
Twitter, you can (and do) shout and abuse, but at least read my bio. Those shows are literally the only ones I can answer for. They don’t include the news or QT or Today. Just so you know you are wasting your time if you message me about them. Sorry.
His far-left critics aren't buying it:
Unless, of course, you feel the need to respond to comments/complaints about other shows or BBC news outlets. As you have done when it suits e.g. Remembrance Day “mistake” and Johnson (not) being laughed at editing “mistake”.
Much as I like Rob and admire the way he engages, his far-left critics here do have a point. Though there's never any excuse for abuse, and those who engage in such behaviour are a disgrace, he does sometimes have his cake and eat it by defending the BBC against criticism of programmes which fall well outside those mentioned in his bio. And if he does that then, surely, he lays himself open to being questioned about those programmes too, doesn't he?

Corbynista Twitter


I'm hearing reports that the BBC's political editor has hacked a horse to death with a machete. I've made no effort to establish whether they're true or not, but I've typed it out and shared it with tens of thousands of followers anyway.