Saturday 25 November 2017

Bias complaints against Evan Davis and Eddie Mair upheld


Evan Davis, sitting on the BBC's naughty step

This week's Feedback ended with Roger Bolton saying:
Finally, last week under pressure from Ofcom, its new regulator, the BBC agreed to publish the number of complaints it receives each fortnight and to reveal which individual programmes had over 100 complaints. We promised to keep you up-to-date with those that concerned radio. Well, the corporation has now published the first wave and...[drum roll]...O bathos! As yet no radio programmes have reached that bar. How inoffensive! The corporation must try harder.
It's quite surprising to think that, say, Today has received fewer than 100 complaints over a fortnight. People are always complaining about Today without, it seems, ever actually complaining about it (if you know what I mean!). 

According to the Guardian, only two BBC programmes have received over 100 complaints - Have I Got News For You and Strictly Come Dancing. 

There are, however, a couple of intriguing passages in that Guardian piece relevant to the main theme of this little blog of ours. 

Firstly,
The BBC has also revealed that a complaint regarding due impartiality and bias against Radio 4’s PM, which is presented by Eddie Mair, was upheld. The complaint related to an episode on 8 June, but details of the issue raised was not provided.
And secondly, 
An episode of Newsnight was also ruled to have bias in its coverage of the French presidential election, giving the impression that the host Evan Davis favoured Emmanuel Macron over Marine Le Pen. The BBC’s executive complaints unit, which handled the complaint, said: “Newsnight has been reminded of the requirements of due impartiality, so that the perception of its coverage matches its intent.”
The Eddie Mair one is mysterious. The BBC isn't saying how Eddie fell foul of the BBC's rules on bias. 

The Evan Davis one is much less mysterious. The only mystery there is why he's not received such a telling-off before!

4 comments:

  1. Only the BBC could find it rational or trustworthy to publish an upheld complaint on something they keep secret

    ReplyDelete
  2. On a more contemplaintivd note, I wonder if I and others successfully ground down by the BBC complaints system should rejoin the fray to see if that messes wIth stats slightly less likely to be 'massaged' in house?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, that sounds like a good idea. There's now a point to complaining again.

      Delete
    2. Might still be worth laying in stocks of midnight oil as well popcorn, as the interference drones and ECU directorship are still there to drag it out over months.

      At least I am no longer banned.

      Delete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.