Sunday 17 July 2016

A conspiracy theory or a conspiracy?

There was a very striking 'audio essay' on this morning's Broadcasting House from American novelist and translator Maureen Freely (who also writes for the Guardian and Independent). 

Her subject was 'coups in Turkey', and she recalled previous coups - some of which caught up her left-wing family and friends.

This latest coup attempt, however, struck her as something very different from those previous coups:
Let's start with the military, which was pretty much decapitated seven years ago when Erdogan incarcerated its entire top echelon on treason charges he later dropped. 
How could a handful of officers operating inside the severely compromised force have dared to think a coup possible? 
Why, when they went ahead anyway, did they focus on the photogenic or the iconic - Istanbul Airport, the Bosphorus bridges, the National Assembly, the Monument of the Republic in Taksim Square? 
Why were the troops and tanks they sent there so few in number and so vulnerable to the angry mob?  
Why, while the coup was being live-streamed, did its leaders fail to show their faces?  
Why was no attempt made to capture Erdogan? 
How, amid the chaos, did he manage to FaceTime the entire nation before landing at an airport that had stopped all flights? 
Why by then was there an imam singing solidarity from every minaret?  
Why, after the coup was crushed, did the President urge his people to return to the streets? 
This was, of course, a call for scepticism, and she strongly implied that this was all far too convenient for President Erdogan in his ongoing attempts to crush all dissent.

Those questions, from what I've read and seen so far, are certainly pertinent ones.


The two other voices on BH who commented on the attempted coup (or should that be 'attempted coup'?) were UKIP's Suzanne Evans and Newsnight's James O'Brien, and both shared Ms Freely's heavy leanings towards a 'conspiracy theory' here.

Suzanne Evans said:
Since this failed coup on Friday night Erdogan's government have rounded up over 2,800 soldiers and put out over 2,700 arrest warrants for judges, of all people. And you just think, how did they manage to round up nearly 5,000 people so quickly? There are rumours circulating that Erdogan is not exactly unhappy with this coup, that he might even have had something to do with it. These kind of actions actually almost seem to fuel that idea......But whether it was or it wasn't [planned by Erdogan], what concerns me about this is that this will give Erdogan an excuse to clamp down and pursue an ever more extreme Islamist agenda.
James O'Brien said;
It is, you're right, hard to imagine that these rounding-ups could have been in direct response to an 'unexpected' coup, but I guess it's the slow dismantling of Ataturk's legacy.

Are Maureen Freely, Suzanne Evans and JO'B  correct in their suspicions? 

Was this whole. bloody affair a 'Black Ops' operation by the Erdogan government?

(If so, it was very black indeed, given the loss of life.)

I tend not to believe in conspiracy theories though. Should I start to here?


One thing I do know is that Radio 4 can't be accused of pro-Erdogan bias here. 


  1. I'm still thinking it was a genuine military coup attempt, but from only a small portion of officers without nearly enough support to make it happen. This isn't the middle ages, they don't need to arrest Erdogan immediately and flog him in the public square. Name one recent 'regime change' where the deposed leader was captured on Day One, and that's all that was necessary.

    They needed to take over institutions and infrastructure, and cut off all his access to everything. Then they go get him at their leisure. I'm not at all surprised that Erdogan's people were able to round up a bunch of suspects right away. Of course there will be informers from the losing side who tipped him off and they're probably all on an enemies list anyway.

    In any case, that part of the world lives and breathes conspiracy theories, so suspicions that Erdogan did the burning of the Reichstag routine don't impress me yet. Another conspiracy theory is that this was driven by Gulen. I admit I didn't know that Gulen apparently has fallen out with Erdogan over the latter's increasing authoritarianism and crushing of free speech and dissent. But if that's really the case, why were all the supporters out in the streets men with mustaches and almost zero women? We've seen this pantomime before

    Erdogan's supporters are Islamist, and he's spent the last few years getting rid of secularist generals and officials. I think that's why it was a genuine secularist military coup attempt, but he's weakened his opposition enough already that there was no chance of success. The Beeboids will as usual get over-emotional and get caught up in whatever hysteria their local friends and stringers are claiming. We saw that in Iran and Egypt and Libya.

  2. Erdogan is not a democrat and so it is legitimate to oppose him if you are a democrat. It seems unlikely that you could keep such a coup plot entirely secret and unknown to Erdogan's secret services. Perhaps he had some foreknowledge...but I doubt he actually planned it himself. Not even Theresa May would be that devious.


Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.