I always find it interesting to see how different media organisations angle a particular 'breaking news story'. The news today is that Andy Coulson has been found guilty while Rebekah Brooks has been cleared.
The BBC is leading with news of the verdicts in the 'Hacking Trial'. They have two main headlines about it, heading the two main sections of their home page:
The various minor headlines linking to related articles beneath run as follows:Andy Coulson guilty of phone hackingCameron apologises over Coulson
Phone-hacking trial updates LiveCameron apologises over CoulsonCameron 'extremely sorry'Blunkett: 'I was near breakdown'Media scrum outside courtBalls and Osborne on verdictBrooks cleared in hacking trialHacking charges and verdicts so far
Note how the guilty verdict against Andy Coulson is very much the story for the BBC. The not guilty verdict against Rebekah Brooks is relegated to 7th place in their minor headlines.
Not so with ITV News which is running the story with the following two banner headlines, and placing Rebekah Brooks' not guilty verdict first:
ITV's three main 'Live news stream' headlines also offer a balance:Rebekah Brooks found not guilty of all hacking chargesPM's 'full and frank apology' for employing Andy Coulson
Ex-No 10 spin doctor Andy Coulson guilty of phone hackingRebekah Brooks cleared of all charges in phone hacking trialCameron offers 'full and frank' apology for hiring Coulson
Sky News has four main headlines on the story and balances the two sides of the story:
The Times places the good news first but conveys both sides of the story succinctly:Cameron Apology: 'I Was Wrong To Hire Coulson'Hacking: Brooks Cleared But Coulson GuiltyPhone-Hacking Trial Verdicts: Live UpdatesWhat Now For The 'Flame-Haired Empathiser'?
Hacking: Brooks cleared, Coulson guilty
The Guardian places it the other way round, but also gives both sides of the story their due:
Phone hacking: Andy Coulson guilty as Brooks walks free
By their slants do you know them. The BBC's slant seems by far the sharpest, doesn't it?
P.S. From a comments at Biased BBC, it looks as if this particular slant is at play across the BBC: