...and any other matters that take our fancy
More than odd.as far as i can make out the choices are:a) It happened as he saysb) Something happened but he embellishedc) It was his 'Hillary under sniper' fire momentHowever the only reports I have seen have been the Mail and, oddly, Graun and Indy tweets used in RT by their readership saying this all proves his bonkers.What no one, so far, including the BBC seems to have done is check further, especially with the French police.Why not?Or, rather. Pourquoi pas?
Vous avez tout à fait raison.
It seems a rather important question whether it's a, b or c. If a, we might be in Thorpeland again. Surely this needs investigating further. The BBC's silences are often more outrageous than their prejudices.
Just noting this seems to have quietly passed by without further comment, or investigation either way, from any media, pro or con.