Thursday, 5 December 2019

Andrew Neil gives Boris both barrels


If you missed it, here's Andrew Neil's monologue at the end of tonight's The Andrew Neil Interview with Nigel Farage:

That concludes our fourth leaders interview for the general election of 2019. There is, of course, still one to be done - Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister. 
We have been asking him for weeks now to give us a date, a time, a venue. As of now, none has been forthcoming. 
No broadcaster can compel a politician to be interviewed, but leaders interviews have been a key part of the BBC's prime time election coverage for decades. We do them, on your behalf, to scrutinise and hold to account those who would govern us. That is democracy. 
We have always proceeded in good faith that the leaders would participate, and in every election they have, all of them, until this one. It is not too late. We have an interview prepared, oven-ready, as Mr Johnson likes to say. 
The theme running through our questions is trust and why at so many times in his career in poltiics and journalism critics and sometimes even those close to him have deemed him to be untrustworthy. It is, of course, relevant to what he is promising us all now. 
Can he be trusted to deliver 50,000 more nurses when almost 20,000 in his numbers are already working for the NHS? He promises 40 new hospitals and only six are scheduled to be built by 2025. Can he believed when he says another 34 will be built in the five years after that? 
Can he be trusted to fund the NHS properly when he uses a cash figure of an extra £34 billion? After inflation the additional money promised amounts to £20 billion. 
He vows that the NHS will not be on the table in any trade talks with America but he vowed to the DUP, his unionist allies in Northern Ireland, that there would never be a border down the Irish Sea - and that is as important to the DUP as the NHS is to the rest of us. It is a vow his Brexit deal would seem to break. 
Now he tells us he has always been an opponent of austerity. We would ask him for evidence of that. And we would want to know why an opponent of austerity would bake so much of it into their future spending plans. We would ask why, as with the proposed increase in police numbers, so many of his promises only take us back to the future, back to where we were before austerity began. 
Social care is an issue of growing concern. On the steps of Downing Street in July he said he had prepared a plan for social care. We would ask him why that plan is not in his manifesto. 
Questions of trust. Questions we would like to put to Boris Johnson so you can hear his replies. But we can't, because he won't sit down with us. 
There is no law, no Supreme Court ruling, that can force Mr Johnson to participate in a BBC leaders interview. But the Prime Minister of our nation will at times have to stand up to President Trump, President Putin, President Xi of China, so it was surely not expecting too much that he spent half an hour standing up to me. 
Good night.

14 comments:

  1. This is really why the BBC can't itself be trusted. They have put Boris on the naughty step for several years now, implying he is an especially dishonest politician. That is what I object to - the "especially" bit. The BBC have worked day and night to create this image of Boris the Serial Liar...using its so called comedy shows like HIGNFY as well as news programmes to achieve the objective. Underlying it all was their fear I think that Boris was a very popular politician and therefore dangerous in potentially stopping the creation of a permanent progressivist majority in Parliament. That's why he became prime target of the PC alliance.

    But where's the evidence that he is uniquely untruthful? Was Cameron being honest and trustworthy when he backed Turkey's early accession to the EU, and then told us Turkey will never join, or that there were no plans for an EU army? Did Osborne really believe those figures he had the Treasury put out about the losses for each UK family if we voted (just voted!) for Brexit? Is Corbyn being honest and truthful when he claims his contacts with the IRA were all about supporting a peace process? Was McDonnell being honest and truthful when he told us he was sorry about having made unpleasant jokes about political assassination of his political enemies? Was May being honest and truthful in telling us year after year she was working to get net migration under 100,000? Was Jo Swinson being honest and truthful when she told us in 2010 that she supported a simple in-out Referendum on the EU (like Nick Clegg back then)?

    That's a long list of nos. I could continue for the next 24 hours and still not exhaust the list of other politicians' dishonest claims.

    For me, Boris has been far more trustworthy and truthful as PM than May, Cameron, Brown or Blair ever were.

    It seems that for whatever reason Neil was going to "go with the meme" about trust and truthfulness. Boris was and is right to be wary. Why should the scapegoat allow himself to be led to the abbatoir?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Boris Johnson would be quite justified in refusing another interview with one of the BBC's senior 'journalists' given Sundays debacle on the Marr show. Clearly, the BBC think Andrew Neil would do a better job of 'getting Boris' than Marr.

      Delete
    2. Having read through and checked the transcript Sue posted, I can confirm that all the points included in Andrew Neil's list above were covered by Andrew Marr. I noted some headings:

      AN: Trust in Boris, 50,000 nurses, NHS, Brexit (only in so far as divisions between the Conservatives and the DUP can be exploited), austerity, social care, and trust in Boris Johnson - again.

      AM: Sentencing, Justice, Magistrates Courts, NHS, 50,000 nurses, social care, libraries,Brexit (only in as far as tarifs between NI and GB are concerned), taxes, far-right and Islamophobia. Also, Marr pressed Boris Johnson about a future interview with AN, justifying the duplication by saying: "But, it's a different audience". How is it a different audience BBC?

      Delete
    3. Andrew Neil suggests that his interview is 'oven ready' - all he needs is the PM to step up. It's a good analogy. Take care when reheating food - especially chicken! Marr's effort was sadly undercooked.

      Delete
  2. At least, unlike Corbyn, Boris has never shared an office with an IRA bomb-maker...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7757293/Why-DID-Jeremy-Corbyn-share-offices-convicted-IRA-bomb-maker.html?ito=email_share_article-top

    I don't suppose this story will be featuring on the BBC website.

    ReplyDelete
  3. BBC R4 Midnight News led with Andrew Neil's "challenge" to the BBC.

    Institutional arrogance and hubris too I think. It is not a requirement to be interviewed by the BBC or Andrew Neil to be elected. It is the voters who decide that; the BBC furious at being denied their 100% right to guide us to "correct" thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't blame Boris for not pandering to the BBC. Why should he? They have been running "Operation Get Boris" since the conservative leadership election in July. Good thing nobody watches their tosh anymore!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes - since July and before! People forget how successful the BBC campaign was...for a long time they were telling us that Boris was toxic and would never lead the Conservative Party. Once May had to go they then joined with their media pals in promotion of the absurd, odd and unimpressive Rory Stewart as their preferred candidate, not least because he had absolutely no intention of delivering on Brexit while attacking Boris on several fronts.

      Delete
  5. After seeing the piece by Neil I concluded that it was very good of him to make clear that it was not about policies but just a personal attack on Boris. It was apparent that the BBC did not intend anything but character assassination and Boris would be wise to continue boycotting them and Channel4. Both organisations must not be allowed to be this biased ever again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Conservatives need to get serious on public media reform, like they did on Trade Union democracy back in the 1980s.

      Delete
  6. Since Andrew Neil has itemised the areas he wants to question Boris and provided the answers to his own questions, it seems unnecessary for Boris to attend an interview.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think Boris should agree to half-an-half so Boris gets to ask Neil about Pamela Bordes, his wig (or is it a weave?), what he really thinks about Diane Abbott, his ex-employer Rupert Murdoch, Tramps disco back in the 70s, cocaine and anything else that occurs to him.

      Delete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.