Saturday 20 January 2018

One who looks on and watches



My copy of The Spectator awaited me when I got home from work last night and, beginning at the beginning, it was interesting to note just how much 'BBC stuff' there is in it, starting with Justin Webb's 'Diary' in which Our Justin pays a handsome tribute to his friend John Humphrys, describes his (partial) fondness for his  regular Twitter critics - especially the astrology correspondent of The Lady - and talks about CNN's Christiane Amanpour, who (as you may recall) recently co-hosted Today. Our Justin deliberately let slip an interesting nugget about the CNN star: "When she guest-presented the Today programme recently, she came with a helper who carried her jacket to the studio". As Justin said, she's now "terribly grand".

Then came Charles Moore writing about Sunday evening's The Coronation on BBC One and how "it never explained or even mentioned that the ceremony in which the anointing and the putting on the crown were framed was the communion" and didn't tell viewers that the Queen's taking of communion during her coronation was considered "too sacred a moment for the cameras to film", thus meaning that "the shape of the service could not be understood". Why did the BBC omit those facts? Mr Moore speculates that one reason could be that "the wholly Christian (and specifically Anglican) nature of the entire thing" might have been "considered a slightly tricky subject" by the BBC - which, if true, would be quite something.

And then came Ross Clark registering some qualms about the possibly highly dire unexpected consequences of concerted action to tackle "the great plastic panic" - a 'panic' provoked by distressing scenes involving albatrosses and whales on Sir David Attenborough's landmark BBC One series Blue Planet II. If nothing else this demonstrates the remarkable power of a BBC programme to rouse certain sections of the public (including me via Springwatch) - and, even more so, politicians (following those sections of the public) - into a determination that 'something must be done' and that 'lots must be said' about doing it. 

And finally (so far, as I've not finished reading it yet) came Rod Liddle discussing BBC Women, via a brief review of a science fiction BBC drama called Hard Sun "where the head of MI5 is a Nigerian woman and everyone else in it lives in a mixed-race family". Rod says this is typical BBC "PC social engineering". Worse, it has an "imbecilic plot". He's not tempting me to watch it. As for those revolting BBC Women, he hasn't any kind words for them either, particularly for the way they tried to get John Humphrys sacked. 
Listen, very stupid BBC Women: simply because you believe something, it doesn’t make it the truth. Other people are still allowed opinions, even if they dare to counter your own. My view about people who work for a news organisation yet have a totalitarian approach to diverse opinions is that they should be sacked immediately. That probably includes one of the leading lights of BBC Women, Jane Garvey. It is fine for Ms Gravy to subject the nation to the outdated, boring, misandrist, middle-class moanfest of Woman’s Hour (which she does on those days when her domestic schedule allows), but heaven forefend if someone challenges the tendentious victimhood rot her show puts out every day. Sack him!
Isn't "the outdated, boring, misandrist, middle-class moanfest of Woman’s Hour" such a good way of describing it? 

5 comments:

  1. Haha great! I have been referring to "Womens Hour" as "Moaners Hour" in recent posts. I am not Rod Liddle, honestly!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I will look forward to reading that later. :)

    I like the Ms "Gravy" typo (I presume its your typo!). . Her thoughts processes are a bit like gravy - thick, quick to congeal and lending a similar taste to everything.

    As for the "plastic panic"...I think plastics are a much greater danger to the ecosystem and to humanity than allegedly human-driven climate change.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alas, it wasn't a typo of mine. That's how it appears in Rod Liddle's piece. I thought he was punning about her being on the BBC Gravy Train.

      Delete
    2. The greatest threat to the ecosystem both worldwide and locally is the ever expanding human population. Doesn't get any mention from the BBC's ecowarriors.

      Delete
    3. I agree Ozfan that the greatest threat to the ecosystem is the out of control population increase that will probably take us over 10 billion before too long. As you these days (unlike back in the 60s and early 70s as I can recall) this hardly ever gets a mention now - for the obvious reason that it offends against the PC multicultarist pro migration agenda.

      Delete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.