 |
| ITMA |
I've resisted this for so long...so please forgive me...but I just can't contain my inner Katty Kay any longer. So:
Here's a new headline from the Spectator today:
Who wrote this piece? I kid ye not, it's the BBC Paul Wood, the BBC reporter most intimately associated with promoting the Trump-Russia conspiracy theories on the BBC!
"Why didn't we see this coming?" he ends his piece by asking!
To repeat myself:
OMG...
To quote a much-mocked-but-ever-more-pertinent phrase, you couldn't make it up!
"But is a mea culpa required? Perhaps. Perhaps not", Paul writes!
[Obviously, the answer on Paul's part was very, very clearly 'Yes, a mea culpa was required, especially on my part as I'm as bad if not worse than any of them, and I am very, very sorry and will try to do better from now on or leave the BBC and seek a more suitable partisan job'].
[Obviously, the answer on Paul's part was very, very clearly 'Yes, a mea culpa was required, especially on my part as I'm as bad if not worse than any of them, and I am very, very sorry and will try to do better from now on or leave the BBC and seek a more suitable partisan job'].
.
Satire is dead! Self-reflection (at the BBC) is dead! BBC reporting is a sick joke!
And I see comments are turned off below his Spectator piece (so far)!
I wonder why!!!
I wonder why!!!
