It's been much quieter on the Easton front than I expected this week, but Mark Easton's series of reports on Englishness continued on Thursday.
There was a report on BBC One's News at Ten that night that took us straight back to four years ago, and that previous series of his on Englishness - the series where I felt he behaved much more like an advocate for regional devolution in England (especially for metropolitan mega-authorities and the like) and an opponent of 'English nationalist' calls for a devolved English parliament than an impartial reporter.
This latest report on Thursday tackled exactly the same question - 'An English parliament or more regional devolution?'.
The piece, as ever with a Mark Easton piece, had a strong narrative arc. It began with people in Sheerness saying they have no influence over decisions made for their local area and complaining that their council [a Tory-run borough council] isn't working for them. It then moved on to Malvern where various [posh] people, inspired (as Mark put it) by "nostalgia", believe an English parliament might be the answer. And it ended in Stockport where the real answer seems to lie: combined authorities. Combined authorities are popular. And they get even more popular after they begin running local affairs. And they are working. It was a real hymn to regional/metropolitan devolution from Mark Easton there and was clearly intended (I think) to leave little doubt in the viewer's mind that this is the bridge that will help local people feel involved in decision-making in their local area.
In other words, it was a report with an agenda.
Newsreader: This week we've been considering questions of local and national identity within the UK, how we feel about the past and future for our communities. England, unlike Scotland and Wales, does not have its own parliament. Mark Easton has been speaking to people in three English communities, to find out how they feel about that and if they want to be closer to political decision making.
Mark Easton: The end of the line. This corner of North East Kent on the River Medway was once the beating heart of British naval might, but power and influence have trickled away on the tide of history. Almost 85% of people here feel they have little or no influence over the decisions that affect their local area, and the vast majority say they're disconnected from power both nationally and locally. The geography of Sheerness may help explain the town's peculiar sense of detachment, but across England almost eight in ten people think they have very little or no influence over national decisions that affect their area, and seven out of ten say their link to council decision making is no better.
Sheerness Vox Pop 1: You elect, don't you, the people you want to lead you, but then they have their little meetings and they decide what they want, and I don't really think it reflects too much on what people want. Sheerness Vox Pop 2: I feel a bit cut off, yeah, a little bit, like we're in own little corner of the world. Sheerness Vox Pop 3:You've got one toilet in the town, one phone in the town, it just doesn't work and you can't talk to anybody.
Many in England look enviously at the power devolved to the other UK nations, complaining that English local government has been emasculated as central government has become more distant. Travel to Malvern in Worcestershire, where Sir Edward Elgar was inspired to compose anthems to his beloved England, and there is evident nostalgia for a country more in tune with its rural heritage and more in control of its own destiny. The idea of an English Parliament has strong support in these parts.
Malvern Vox Pop 1: I would be personally in favour of an English parliament. English Members of Parliament should be voting on English matters. Malvern Vox Pop 2: I think it would help to give us our own identity and perhaps a feeling of cohesiveness that perhaps isn't there at the moment. Mark Easton (to Malvern Vox Pop 3): Would you like an English parliament? Malvern Vox Pop 3: Yeah, I would. I don't agree with Scottish MPs voting on things that are nothing to do with them, and they do. Mark Easton (to Malvern Vox Pop 3): Do you resent London a bit? Malvern Vox Pop 3: Yes, I do.
From Elgar's green and pleasant Worcestershire, travel north, to Stockport, a town forged in the Industrial Revolution, now being regenerated and where people report a much greater sense of control over their affairs than the England average. Councils in Greater Manchester, Stockport included, pioneered the development of combined authorities - town halls joining together to take on powers previously run from Whitehall. Now they're still very new, but it does seem that people are generally enthusiastic, and nowhere more so than places that already have one. Asked if they'd like a combined authority in their area, 48% of people in England said they would. If you exclude those who didn't feel they knew enough to comment, support rises to 73%. And in Stockport the equivalent figure is 87%. In one of Stockport's old factories - a building that once boasted of being the largest cotton mill in the world - local entrepreneurs are supported as they seek to grow. With power flowing back to the North, optimism is on the up.
Stuart Bradley, entrepeneur: Really creating a sense of unity and energy that was much needed, and yeah, that idea of bringing it away from Westminster and owning that decision-making. Ele Leatherbarrow, entrepeneur: There's definite differences in the north and I think Manchester is a big place for people to identify as sort of a centre of power.
The people of England generally feel excluded from the decisions that affect them and their local area. The connection to power seems too weak. Finding a bridge for that divide is the answer to the English question. Mark Easton, BBC News, England.
I saw a lot of the "The Mark Easton Show" on Thursday in what puports to be the 10 O'Clock News on BBC 1. As you say, pure advocacy (and one motivated by wider, unspoken, concerns about the big project...advancing PC multiculturalism and the European superstate).ReplyDelete
He must have hunted hard for those pro-English parliament voices among the "posh", "eccentric" and "nostalgic" country set. I should think it's the last thing on their minds. But if you ask them - and I am sure Easton did in many different ways - they will tell you they don't like SNP members deliberating on English matters while we can't deliberate on Scottish matters.
The snippets of conversation we saw were I am sure the result of several minutes of conversation with Easton steering them into the desired statements. From what I could see, the people simply wanted Scottish MPs at Westminster to be prevented from voting on purely English matters, which isn't really the same as saying you want a whole new bureaucracy and system of governance known as an "English Parliament" being set up.
And then we had the nonsense of whether people feel they "influence" their council in some Easton-approved model council (like one of those exemplary Maoist villages), with some dubious stats being quoted (a minority yes suddenly became a majority yes once the Master Magician had a excluded a huge number of don't knows).
Actually now I think about it, Mark does have something of the sharp-suited magician about him (as well as an unprincipled estate agent) - able to make things appear and disappear. "Pick a card, any card"...but he knows the card always says: "You have chosen to become part of a vibrant PC multiculturalist society and even if you haven't yet you will soon."
His BBC News website piece about it begins:ReplyDelete
"The saccharine aroma of reminiscence pervades many an English front parlour. As mantel clocks tick, the faces of England stare regretfully through net curtains, yearning for yesterday."
"Optimism is in short supply and a beguiling nostalgia threatens to turn into resentment or bitterness. Instead of listening to the mantel clock ticking, reminiscing for a lost age, England needs to find a way to reconnect with its citizenry."
How many people, even "old" people, have a mantel clock in their home these days? I think it's Easton who's living in the past. Perhaps his grandma once told him she didn't like his purple flares. (BTW, he's coming up to 60 himself which might explain the age obsession - sharp suits can only disguise the ageing process up to a point).ReplyDelete
I suspect that a majority of the older people Easton patronizes voted Leave with a sense of optimism that things could change for the better and that they would regain some measure of control over the political life of the country. Of course this isn't the kind of optimism Easton wants to hear about or the sort of control he wants the public to have.ReplyDelete
If he has found diminishing optimism it is probably much to do with project fear and the increasing perception that the government is trying it's best to destroy the possibility of real control for the British people.
Of course Easton isn't going to give that view any credit or exposure even if he is capable of perceiving it.
Yes, good point. And Easton would never admit that some of the most dynamic high growth or prosperous economies on the planet are not members of transnational blocs: China, S Korea, Singapore, Japan, Australia and New Zealand come to mind.Delete