A guest post by Arthur T....
Edwina Sandys’s Sculpture - Christa c.1972
The recent open thread discussion about the BBC coverage of the sale of 'Le tableau de
Cimabue sur le thème du "Christ moqué”’ - see 28th October 2019 - prompted me to bring to the
attention of ITBBCB? readers a series of ‘silences’ from the BBC where sculptures depicting
Christ have been ring-fenced in a way which discourages public debate over these religious
subjects.
Previously, I have described the sculpture Ecce Homo, a Fourth Plinth piece by Turner Prize
winning artist Mark Wallinger, which, under the auspices of non- religious Amnesty International,
was positioned on the steps of St Paul’s Cathedral in London. This significant event received no
coverage from the BBC. Ordinarily, the reintroduction of such a piece of work would receive
renewed plaudits from Will Gompertz. After all, this is an important piece of Millennial work.
The criticism of Wallinger’s Ecce Homo (Behold the Man - exactly the same subject as Cimabue’s)
is that the Christian message of Christ’s suffering is absent. Indeed, the figure has been compared
to an expression confident comfort and became something of a gay icon. You would think that
this would receive positive comment from the BBC as a statement of inclusivity - not an ominous
silence.
Similarly, the piece of work by Canadian sculptor Timothy Schmaltz Homeless Jesus received little
other than throwaway remarks from the BBC about the piece not being able to find a home in
London. From Wikipedia:
Manchester has recently approved an installation outside St Ann’s church. The statue was originally going to be installed in Westminster outside of the Methodist Church's Westminster Central Hall but was eventually rejected [Planning Permission refused]. The city believed that the statue would not properly reflect the nature. The Bishop of Manchester reflected on the importance of having Homeless Jesus. He remembered Jesus saying that turning away from helping someone in need is like turning from Jesus.
This decision was taken after the piece’s position outside St Martins in the Fields church in
London had been rejected on the grounds that it might encourage the homeless to gather there -
this from a church renowned for helping the homeless. Homelessness is an issue that the BBC
hold dear, and quite rightly so. So why, when an opportunity arises to treat the subject from a
Christian viewpoint, do the BBC distance themselves so obviously?
The image at the head of this shows a detail of Edwina Sandys’s bronze sculpture Christa. Hers is
a fascinating story. As debutante and Winston Churchill’s granddaughter, Edwina Sandys (b.1938),
whilst living in London, first modelled this piece c1972 in clay. Later it was made into a bronze.
The work represented a female Christ. In the 1980s when she moved to New York she took it with
her, hanging it on her apartment wall, and in 1986 it was shown in the Cathedral of St John the
Divine in Manhattan. There was such a public outcry about the subject that Sandys was
instructed to remove her work after just eleven days.
Fast forward to 2016. Public perceptions in the US have changed completely. The work is now
accepted and has its position within the same cathedral on the altar in the chapel of St Saviours.
Attitudes towards LGBT issues have been transformed. The concept of Female Christ has
traction, and is the subject of academic work: Divine transgressions: The Female Christ - form in
art, by Julie Clague.
On the ITBBCB? site, there is always a temptation to concentrate upon the here and now - feature
what happened in BBC output for last night or last week. Alongside, are evolving forms of bias
that only become evident wit the passage of time - Bias by Silence, a new addition to the fifty.
Homelessness as tagged to Homeless Jesus, and LGBT issues as tagged to Christa and Ecce
Homo matters that would be high on the list of the BBC PC ideologies, but by reason of their
arrival at their feet via a strongly Christian message, they are ignored. Is the discussion to be
denied by the BBC because of their Christian source? Or, is it the aniconism represented in these
depictions, which is an affront to the RoP?
I believe so. Christa, as a depiction of a naked female Christ attracts a double condemnation by
the RoP of a) as the image of the prophet Jesus Christ, and b) the female form.
Yet, this form is of late acceptable in the conservative Christian world in the USA. Our friends
stateside have become more tolerant as the BBC with their PC hat on would applaud, whilst we in
the UK have become less tolerant for fear of upsetting a minority. An Avowed Silence?
