Thursday, 14 November 2019

Collateral damage



One might think that the title “Palestinian Islamic Jihad” wasn’t explicit enough. Islamic Jihad. (The word Jihad is defined as ‘a struggle or fight against the enemies of Islam’.)

Now that we are beginning to absorb the fact that ‘Islam’ is part and parcel of modern-day diverse Britain and that criticism of Islam’s ideological principles is deemed racist and politically incorrect it has come to pass that to criticise or to question Islam is tantamount to blasphemy. 

This explains Mishal Husain’s default confrontational manner when speaking to an Israeli, as detailed here. Husain declaims the innocence of the wife of “Islamic Jihad Commander” Baha Abu al-Ata. 
This pro-Islam mission-creep also explains why the subject of the recent, so-called targeted assassination is described by the BBC as a “militant” rather than a terrorist. NVV. No visible value-judgement.