We’re havin’ a heatwave. I’m alone at the helm of the good ship “Is the BBC Biased?” while Craig is on holiday so postings might be few and far between for the next few days, and less diverse than those to which you’ve become accustomed.
As I write I’m defrosting the freezer because someone left the door ajar all night and the drawers have iced up and won’t budge.
I haven’t listened to much radio or TV apart from a small segment of the Today programme, (Giles Fraser was on TFTD again) and a tiny bit of last night’s Newsnight, which was about Greece. Evan Davis looked gaunt and cadaverous and Emily Maitlis looked tired and weary. Nothing new to say about it.
I think the BBC’s unpopularity has reached a new low. Both the audience and the BBC staffers seem to have lost their enthusiasm. Maybe it’s the heatwave, maybe it’s the stress of the imminent charter renewal and funding issues, maybe it’s just because there’s no new talent and all the old talent, whomever or whatever that was, has moved on or died.
There’s no heavyweight politics - the nearest is Andrew Neil’s politics show, but that’s a bit curate’s egg, what with his erratic choices of whom to savage and whom to suck up to.
The comedy is stale and repetitive or entirely dependent on shock, or someone’s idea of being offensive, (as long as it’s not offensive to Muslims.) The drama is formulaic and safe and the reality shows are unreal, set up, contrived or faked.
The Scandi serials on BBC4 are refreshing - that’s partly because of the unfamiliarity of the scenery and of the actors, but even they seem interchangeable and ubiquitous once you get used to them. The current series from Belgium, Cordon, is weird. It’s full of scenes where you can only wonder what the hell is supposed to be going on. Why, for example was there only one room with one bed in it at the National Institute for infectious diseases? Actually I don’t even want to go there. (a....tisshhoo!)
Everything that threatens to get serious is hobbled by political correctness. Here is something by Douglas Murray you’ll have read already:
“The night after the Charlie Hebdo atrocities I was pre-recording a Radio 4 programme. My fellow discussant was a very nice Muslim man who works to ‘de-radicalise’ extremists. We agreed on nearly everything. But at some point he said that one reason Muslims shouldn’t react to such cartoons is that Mohammed never objected to critics.
There may be some positive things to be said about Mohammed, but I thought this was pushing things too far and mentioned just one occasion when Mohammed didn’t welcome a critic. Asma bint Marwan was a female poetess who mocked the ‘Prophet’ and who, as a result, Mohammed had killed. It is in the texts. It is not a problem for me. But I can understand why it is a problem for decent Muslims. The moment I said this, my Muslim colleague went berserk. How dare I say this? I replied that it was in the Hadith and had a respectable chain of transmission (an important debate). He said it was a fabrication which he would not allow to stand. The upshot was that he refused to continue unless all mention of this was wiped from the recording. The BBC team agreed and I was left trying to find another way to express the same point. The broadcast had this ‘offensive’ fact left out.
I cannot imagine another religious discussion where this would happen, but it is perfectly normal when discussing Islam. On that occasion I chose one case, but I could have chosen many others, such as the hundreds of Jews Mohammed beheaded with his own hand. Again, that’s in the mainstream Islamic sources. I haven’t made it up. It used to be a problem for Muslims to rationalise, but now there are people trying to imitate such behaviour in our societies it has become a problem for all of us, and I don’t see why people in the free world should have to lie about what we read in historical texts.
I always notice the rolling updates on our sidebar. Nine times out of ten the BBC’s are lightweight and trivial, or celebrity or sports related, while all the others tend to feature news and topical issues. I don’t know why this is. I suppose it’s to do with our old friends Dave and Sue. They’re politically correct, left-leaning and a bit thick.
One issue has caught my eye. The campaign by our PC MPs to ban the BBC from its one piece of accurate reporting i.e. referring to the Islamic State as the Islamic State.ReplyDelete
If any one of the idiot MPs could tell me which aspect of Islamic State's governing arrangements are "unIslamic" then I would be very surprised.
Perhaps the most effed up thing about it is that the BBC is already doing it. It's like the whole thing from Cameron is pure political public posturing (shocking, I know) and the BBC is pretending they're not doing what his bidding just so they can complain editorial independence.Delete
I know we usually laugh at those who claim the BBC is in bed with the Government, but this is one instance where it's very obviously true. Only because they share the same agenda. I bet there aren't even any low-level Young Communist staff freaking out at management colluding with the nasty Tories because the agenda optics are still good.
Sue, the first point is nothing to do with the BBC and probably too late for this time....but hot hotwater bottles are an excellent way of speeding up the defrosting process.ReplyDelete
Whilst I have been watching the tennis at Wimbledon, I read that Clare Baldings input is not going well. I have managed to avoid it. But I am sick and tired of hearing how well the England women's football team are doing, especially the interview this morning on Today where they had managed to find a Muslim woman footballer to tell us how great it all is. I used to be on a BBC panel and when we were asked about what we thought of women's football, notwithstanding the other people on the panel only the positive comments were included in the report for the Trust (and I always had the impression that the Trust let it be known what they wanted to hear).